From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BC0C43463 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3392145D for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="aKFlF+6y" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726641AbgIULtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:49:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56342 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726522AbgIULtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:49:31 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1600688969; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3ByZHliO9xGu4qAvhF4W99RnKyoIv7qIEmoIOubJl9E=; b=aKFlF+6yb/YdhzNOhSNDVUm5yfH1UKsXRsN+k8RYWE7qpt3tmDXEbMwe3rPxLxX2MhXxo2 ANl8l0XgQiL0S9W5lVb774uCyaPv/JrSQB+WKn+2GXqvpAZ+yujZKqpH0EX00yRScmit7t RkYCMJaHvyv6JnAHJXrU9XOvggAG5yc= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC23ACA3; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1600688954.2424.76.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: cdc-acm: add Whistler radio scanners TRX series support From: Oliver Neukum To: Johan Hovold Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Caujolle-Bert , stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:49:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200921113601.GT24441@localhost> References: <20200921081022.6881-1-johan@kernel.org> <1600677792.2424.61.camel@suse.com> <20200921093145.GS24441@localhost> <1600684156.2424.65.camel@suse.com> <20200921113601.GT24441@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 13:36 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:29:16PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: Hi, > I meant that instead of falling back to "combined-interface" probing we > could assume that all interfaces with three endpoints are "combined" and > simply ignore the union and call managementy. descriptors and all the ways > that devices may have gotten those wrong. I am afraid we would break the spec. I cannot recall a prohibition on having more endpoints than necessary. Heuristics and ignoring invalid descriptors is one things. Ignoring valid descriptors is something else. > I was thinking more of the individual entries in the device-id table > whose control interfaces may not even be of the Communication class. But > hopefully that was verified when adding them. Now you are confusing me. In case of a quirky device, why change the current logic? Regards Oliver