All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:13:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de>

+ Dave and Daniel
+ Stephen

Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-26 09:29:59)
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > > vmalloc interface rework.  It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> > > the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
> > > the allocated area.  It was originally addeds for Xen (which isn't
> > > modular to start with), and then grew users in zsmalloc and i915
> > > which seems to mostly qualify as abuses of the interface, especially
> > > for i915 as a random driver should not set up PTE bits directly.
> > > 
> > > Note that the i915 patches apply to the drm-tip branch of the drm-tip
> > > tree, as that tree has recent conflicting commits in the same area.
> > 
> > Is the drm-tip material in linux-next yet?  I'm still seeing a non-trivial
> > reject in there at present.
> 
> I assumed it was, but the reject imply that they aren't.  Tvrtko, do you
> know the details?

I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests into
two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.

I think a simple course of action might be to start including drm-intel-gt-next
in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add
extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so.

Which specific patches are missing in this case?

Regards, Joonas

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:13:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de>

+ Dave and Daniel
+ Stephen

Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-26 09:29:59)
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > > vmalloc interface rework.  It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> > > the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
> > > the allocated area.  It was originally addeds for Xen (which isn't
> > > modular to start with), and then grew users in zsmalloc and i915
> > > which seems to mostly qualify as abuses of the interface, especially
> > > for i915 as a random driver should not set up PTE bits directly.
> > > 
> > > Note that the i915 patches apply to the drm-tip branch of the drm-tip
> > > tree, as that tree has recent conflicting commits in the same area.
> > 
> > Is the drm-tip material in linux-next yet?  I'm still seeing a non-trivial
> > reject in there at present.
> 
> I assumed it was, but the reject imply that they aren't.  Tvrtko, do you
> know the details?

I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests into
two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.

I think a simple course of action might be to start including drm-intel-gt-next
in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add
extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so.

Which specific patches are missing in this case?

Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] remove alloc_vm_area v2
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:13:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de>

+ Dave and Daniel
+ Stephen

Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-26 09:29:59)
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > > vmalloc interface rework.  It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> > > the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
> > > the allocated area.  It was originally addeds for Xen (which isn't
> > > modular to start with), and then grew users in zsmalloc and i915
> > > which seems to mostly qualify as abuses of the interface, especially
> > > for i915 as a random driver should not set up PTE bits directly.
> > > 
> > > Note that the i915 patches apply to the drm-tip branch of the drm-tip
> > > tree, as that tree has recent conflicting commits in the same area.
> > 
> > Is the drm-tip material in linux-next yet?  I'm still seeing a non-trivial
> > reject in there at present.
> 
> I assumed it was, but the reject imply that they aren't.  Tvrtko, do you
> know the details?

I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests into
two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.

I think a simple course of action might be to start including drm-intel-gt-next
in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add
extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so.

Which specific patches are missing in this case?

Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-28 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24 13:58 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: update the documentation for vfree Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm: add a VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES flag for vmap Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: add a vmap_pfn function Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm: allow a NULL fn callback in apply_to_page_range Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: use vmap in shmem_pin_map Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 13:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:05     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: stop using kmap in i915_gem_object_map Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 13:01   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:01     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: use vmap " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 13:11   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 13:11     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-25 14:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2020-09-25 14:08     ` Matthew Auld
2020-09-25 14:08     ` Matthew Auld
2020-09-25 14:08     ` Matthew Auld
2020-09-25 14:08     ` Matthew Auld
2020-09-25 16:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 16:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 16:09   ` [PATCH 08/11, fixed] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-25 16:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] xen/xenbus: use apply_to_page_range directly in xenbus_map_ring_pv Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 23:42   ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 23:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 23:42     ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in arch_gnttab_valloc Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 23:43   ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 23:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 23:43     ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-24 13:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm: remove alloc_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 15:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] mm: update the documentation for vfree Patchwork
2020-09-24 15:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-09-24 20:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-09-25 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/11] mm: update the documentation for vfree (rev2) Patchwork
2020-09-26  0:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-09-26  2:43 ` remove alloc_vm_area v2 Andrew Morton
2020-09-26  2:43   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrew Morton
2020-09-26  2:43   ` Andrew Morton
2020-09-26  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-26  6:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-28 10:13     ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2020-09-28 10:13       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-09-28 10:13       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-09-28 12:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-28 12:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 12:43         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-09-29 12:43           ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2020-09-29 12:43           ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-09-30 14:48           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-30 14:48             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-30 18:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-30 18:37               ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-30 18:37               ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-30 18:37               ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --subject='Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.