From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Stancek Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:56:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [v2] readahead02: fix read_ahead_kb file not found In-Reply-To: <1526367732.41107.1473171720947.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <1472812953-30811-1-git-send-email-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> <747949240.1570236.1473060993124.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1526367732.41107.1473171720947.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1603573767.285723.1473775007201.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jan Stancek" > To: "Naresh Kamboju" > Cc: "graeme gregory" , "milosz wasilewski" , > akpm@linux-foundation.org, "fengguang wu" , ltp@lists.linux.it > Sent: Tuesday, 6 September, 2016 4:22:00 PM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [v2] readahead02: fix read_ahead_kb file not found > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Naresh Kamboju" > > To: "Jan Stancek" > > Cc: "chrubis" , ltp@lists.linux.it, > > akpm@linux-foundation.org, "fengguang wu" > > , "graeme gregory" , > > "milosz wasilewski" > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 6 September, 2016 2:33:58 PM > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [v2] readahead02: fix read_ahead_kb file not found > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > On 5 September 2016 at 13:06, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "naresh kamboju" > > >> To: chrubis@suse.cz, ltp@lists.linux.it > > >> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "fengguang wu" , > > >> "graeme gregory" , > > >> "milosz wasilewski" > > >> Sent: Friday, 2 September, 2016 12:42:33 PM > > >> Subject: [LTP] [v2] readahead02: fix read_ahead_kb file not found > > >> > > >> From: Naresh Kamboju > > >> > > >> Test case is looking for read_ahead_kb file on a partition device (8:2) > > >> and > > >> not on block device (8:0/8:16/8:32/8:48). The appropriate block device > > >> that > > >> holds the partition can be found at queue/read_ahead_kb entry. Just fyi, there is a patch proposed to change this limit again: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/25/308 Regards, Jan