From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C134C56202 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4042080A for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LQZe9wK/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727868AbgKVMtN (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 07:49:13 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40666 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727646AbgKVMtM (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 07:49:12 -0500 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58D202078D; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:49:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606049352; bh=KRt5IKd4MKIebZbAS8wxQObsMxbM8xgOHWkxy0s1l1g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LQZe9wK/u1Su49gZ3MRsLqsanFqBvlLwhjSfSrcq73hGBTOA/XFtD/vwYaW8HR3I8 CduzeLjQQ+gdp8Sw7KQ40OipiVjRQewdlOPadiJ9gRQbszEh2iiMhFy9Jj24wAeOyD XucmfROLBa73sWIsLkha6paMxaVuStzn5xYzYgGY= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=wait-a-minute.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kgonm-00ChQ9-9f; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:49:10 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Chen Baozi , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/exiu: Fix the index of fwspec for IRQ type Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:49:06 +0000 Message-Id: <160604929559.224131.16896313383969996215.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117032015.11805-1-cbz@baozis.org> References: <20201117032015.11805-1-cbz@baozis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: cbz@baozis.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:20:15 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: > Since fwspec->param_count of ACPI node is two, the index of IRQ type > in fwspec->param[] should be 1 rather than 2. Applied to irq/irqchip-next, thanks! [1/1] irqchip/exiu: Fix the index of fwspec for IRQ type commit: d001e41e1b15716e9b759df5ef00510699f85282 I added Fixes: and Cc: stable tags for a good measure. Cheers, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.