All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 01:12:06 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160704432626.734470.12800460361201622389.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160704429410.734470.15640089119078502938.stgit@magnolia>

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

When we recover a refcount intent from the log, we need to validate its
contents before we try to replay them.  Hoist the checking code into a
separate function in preparation to refactor this code to use validation
helpers.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c
index 7529eb63ce94..a456a2fb794c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c
@@ -417,6 +417,38 @@ const struct xfs_defer_op_type xfs_refcount_update_defer_type = {
 	.cancel_item	= xfs_refcount_update_cancel_item,
 };
 
+/* Is this recovered CUI ok? */
+static inline bool
+xfs_cui_validate_phys(
+	struct xfs_mount		*mp,
+	struct xfs_phys_extent		*refc)
+{
+	xfs_fsblock_t			startblock_fsb;
+	bool				op_ok;
+
+	startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
+			   XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, refc->pe_startblock));
+	switch (refc->pe_flags & XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK) {
+	case XFS_REFCOUNT_INCREASE:
+	case XFS_REFCOUNT_DECREASE:
+	case XFS_REFCOUNT_ALLOC_COW:
+	case XFS_REFCOUNT_FREE_COW:
+		op_ok = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		op_ok = false;
+		break;
+	}
+	if (!op_ok || startblock_fsb == 0 ||
+	    refc->pe_len == 0 ||
+	    startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
+	    refc->pe_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
+	    (refc->pe_flags & ~XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_FLAGS))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a refcount update intent item that was recovered from the log.
  * We need to update the refcountbt.
@@ -433,11 +465,9 @@ xfs_cui_item_recover(
 	struct xfs_trans		*tp;
 	struct xfs_btree_cur		*rcur = NULL;
 	struct xfs_mount		*mp = lip->li_mountp;
-	xfs_fsblock_t			startblock_fsb;
 	xfs_fsblock_t			new_fsb;
 	xfs_extlen_t			new_len;
 	unsigned int			refc_type;
-	bool				op_ok;
 	bool				requeue_only = false;
 	enum xfs_refcount_intent_type	type;
 	int				i;
@@ -449,26 +479,11 @@ xfs_cui_item_recover(
 	 * just toss the CUI.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < cuip->cui_format.cui_nextents; i++) {
-		refc = &cuip->cui_format.cui_extents[i];
-		startblock_fsb = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp,
-				   XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, refc->pe_startblock));
-		switch (refc->pe_flags & XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_TYPE_MASK) {
-		case XFS_REFCOUNT_INCREASE:
-		case XFS_REFCOUNT_DECREASE:
-		case XFS_REFCOUNT_ALLOC_COW:
-		case XFS_REFCOUNT_FREE_COW:
-			op_ok = true;
-			break;
-		default:
-			op_ok = false;
-			break;
-		}
-		if (!op_ok || startblock_fsb == 0 ||
-		    refc->pe_len == 0 ||
-		    startblock_fsb >= mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
-		    refc->pe_len >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
-		    (refc->pe_flags & ~XFS_REFCOUNT_EXTENT_FLAGS))
+		if (!xfs_cui_validate_phys(mp,
+					&cuip->cui_format.cui_extents[i])) {
+			XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
 			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-04  1:11 [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04  1:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: hoist recovered bmap intent checks out of xfs_bui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:55   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered bmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:56   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 19:54     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04  1:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hoist recovered rmap intent checks out of xfs_rui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:59   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered rmap intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 13:59   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-12-04 14:00   ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered refcount intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: hoist recovered extent-free intent checks out of xfs_efi_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: improve the code that checks recovered extent-free intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: validate feature support when recovering rmap/refcount/bmap intents Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-06 23:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 14:02       ` Brian Foster
2020-12-07 16:50         ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04  1:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: trace log intent item recovery failures Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 19:57     ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-06 23:09 [PATCH v3 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01  3:37 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: strengthen log intent validation Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01  3:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: hoist recovered refcount intent checks out of xfs_cui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 10:05   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160704432626.734470.12800460361201622389.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.