[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Rearrange ktime_get to reduce latency against CS

[Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3187 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/selftests: Rearrange ktime_get to reduce latency against CS
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/85611/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9565 -> Patchwork_19290
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19290 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9565/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@active:
    - fi-bsw-n3050:       [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4] ([i915#2675] / [i915#541])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9565/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@active.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@active.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
    - fi-tgl-u2:          [FAIL][5] ([i915#1888]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9565/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html

  * igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-framebuffer-vs-set-tiling:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [DMESG-WARN][7] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9565/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-framebuffer-vs-set-tiling.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-framebuffer-vs-set-tiling.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888
  [i915#2675]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2675
  [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
  [i915#541]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/541


Participating hosts (43 -> 38)
------------------------------

  Missing    (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_9565 -> Patchwork_19290

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_9565: 683dfd284ebe3924e36ae9d3b7edc9ec47080266 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5947: b29c09ca390f864ba71d30144606849496a5ade6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_19290: 71542e245d80f52b410cefee5060919515724675 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

71542e245d80 drm/i915/selftests: Rearrange ktime_get to reduce latency against CS

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19290/index.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3957 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx