All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3.
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:08:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161218489617.27906.14363831896372033248@build.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201125037.1537079-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-02-01 12:50:37)
> Make creation separate from pinning, in order to take the lock only
> once, and pin the mapping with the lock held.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebase on top of upstream changes.
> Changes since v2:
> - Fully clear wa_ctx on error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 8508b8d701c1..a2b916d27a39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ gen10_init_indirectctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch)
>  
>  #define CTX_WA_BB_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE)
>  
> -static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +static int lrc_create_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
>         struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>         struct i915_vma *vma;
> @@ -1437,10 +1437,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>                 goto err;
>         }
>  
> -       err = i915_ggtt_pin(vma, NULL, 0, PIN_HIGH);
> -       if (err)
> -               goto err;
> -
>         engine->wa_ctx.vma = vma;
>         return 0;
>  
> @@ -1452,9 +1448,6 @@ static int lrc_setup_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  void lrc_fini_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
>         i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&engine->wa_ctx.vma, 0);
> -
> -       /* Called on error unwind, clear all flags to prevent further use */
> -       memset(&engine->wa_ctx, 0, sizeof(engine->wa_ctx));
>  }
>  
>  typedef u32 *(*wa_bb_func_t)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch);
> @@ -1466,6 +1459,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>                 &wa_ctx->indirect_ctx, &wa_ctx->per_ctx
>         };
>         wa_bb_func_t wa_bb_fn[ARRAY_SIZE(wa_bb)];
> +       struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
>         void *batch, *batch_ptr;
>         unsigned int i;
>         int err;
> @@ -1494,7 +1488,7 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>                 return;
>         }
>  
> -       err = lrc_setup_wa_ctx(engine);
> +       err = lrc_create_wa_ctx(engine);
>         if (err) {
>                 /*
>                  * We continue even if we fail to initialize WA batch
> @@ -1507,7 +1501,22 @@ void lrc_init_wa_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>                 return;
>         }
>  
> +       if (!engine->wa_ctx.vma)
> +               return;
> +
> +       i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
> +retry:
> +       err = i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->vma->obj, &ww);
> +       if (!err)
> +               err = i915_ggtt_pin(wa_ctx->vma, &ww, 0, PIN_HIGH);
> +       if (err)
> +               goto err;
> +
>         batch = i915_gem_object_pin_map(wa_ctx->vma->obj, I915_MAP_WB);

Given that the pages are already pinned and must remain pinned for the
lifetime of the engine, and the ww is not used here to setup the CPU
page tables, fix the lack of primitives.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 16:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/63] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 01/63] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 17:42   ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 02/63] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 03/63] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 04/63] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 05/63] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 06/63] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 07/63] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 08/63] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 09/63] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 10/63] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 11/63] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 12/63] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:44   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 13/63] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:47   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-29 11:42     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 19:11       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 14/63] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:49   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 15/63] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 16/63] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v6 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 17/63] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 18/63] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 19/63] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 20/63] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 21/63] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 22/63] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 23/63] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 24/63] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 25/63] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 26/63] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 12:50   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-02-01 13:03     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-02-01 13:08     ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 27/63] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 28/63] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 29/63] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 30/63] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 31/63] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 32/63] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 33/63] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 34/63] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 35/63] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 36/63] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 37/63] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 38/63] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 39/63] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 40/63] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 41/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 42/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 43/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 44/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 45/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 46/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 47/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 48/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 49/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 50/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 51/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 52/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 53/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 54/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 55/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 56/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 57/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 58/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 59/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 60/63] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 61/63] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 62/63] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 63/63] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-01-28 17:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev14) Patchwork
2021-01-28 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-28 17:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-01-28 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-29 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev15) Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161218489617.27906.14363831896372033248@build.alporthouse.com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.