From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C50C433E0 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 02:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C6C64F91 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 02:45:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 11C6C64F91 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DXc8S5RtTzDwpy for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:45:12 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031; helo=mail-pj1-x1031.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=ibL2Bbpm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DXc6m1mG8zDqCW for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:43:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id s24so4621164pjp.5 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:43:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5A2c9NOnMfc07zkhqNqcPCYBX3nsYeSTQErFEKr4J9E=; b=ibL2BbpmCIR8pOEWA4qy0pKIcV3Lr17MN5mwQLPlfOyHQsnxsm59f7jSBfDpeI86SR DcTHFXS9EAa9IsRE2ZcA9IWYuV2tUWtmDuVCRxXcGPBGnJ0SzgkFq75Vj53eUNz6Iy7Y IgfgCoxVQJAERIa2EcQYNWcCV3IqHg1q8I3jJvXyE0g5OVss6q0rT/wkIZME0Rtbt59k JzAnvbcTLGQHhJiEJaxWM2S3k492oJdtJFdCDpJmD02zugxeoDQYyL9drCrP7Lka1gu/ 6H2GiXpgBbIhRjZJLI8t7e4Mbou4HWVwz/Drnhpcj9cldWoOuGZg3AR/GlmU0GLp3eFM QRkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5A2c9NOnMfc07zkhqNqcPCYBX3nsYeSTQErFEKr4J9E=; b=XpYDktc9466lEX8hz+NMKfzYEygBf4Fjyz/KRFILFU475BCz129j2R1fv3eYPY1PP0 zWSPtE8Bz+EHifYi/Ix4l7PWxL5qFLDKEcmAAqEOgJhs8oqI1aekA3UcaCy4b9QbHvRA Hh/OImiUtKp1uC3RWQo5WbPMv0yq1NWSyjPEbDV1HdyaiwEJiM6nQnZ3D+noGs7VMx6I Kp9CtuwaIiXF1mU9xceE93ryDHqYniBJwnWev8AcVAFky/1X8LOM7Mmnd0rxxaPudoAj 2X6o1yhMdCZerxp9v3Kn4sbxvtk1w5S7TGFjU0tnBLc2BsyMw+J1MvL54LuDRmdvgZlD /zGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308fsZUmb5zl4WT5F9V5Fv8EUBIr33kKW5yD8a9fKbu0EPImdrP 4AgiUbUcTIl11TrlG3rurUA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyq94wQmsDoauDJNP/laNUJ1hF3GVKyU8fBtMnbwfTaYuYg4KaUP5M+xB+kdx1P8yhvlwGEg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e551:b029:de:8dba:84a3 with SMTP id n17-20020a170902e551b02900de8dba84a3mr6752719plf.8.1612579417856; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (60-242-11-44.static.tpgi.com.au. [60.242.11.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm9649620pjb.2.2021.02.05.18.43.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:43:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:43:31 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 28/42] powerpc: convert interrupt handlers to use wrappers To: Christophe Leroy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20210130130852.2952424-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20210130130852.2952424-29-npiggin@gmail.com> <0e319d85-9fa0-ff97-03b2-93637ad89a99@csgroup.eu> In-Reply-To: <0e319d85-9fa0-ff97-03b2-93637ad89a99@csgroup.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1612579393.6a09rzs6s0.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Athira Rajeev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 5, 2021 6:09 pm: >=20 >=20 > Le 30/01/2021 =C3=A0 14:08, Nicholas Piggin a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin >> --- >=20 >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c >> index f70d3f6174c8..7ff915aae8ec 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c >=20 >> @@ -1462,7 +1474,7 @@ static int emulate_math(struct pt_regs *regs) >> static inline int emulate_math(struct pt_regs *regs) { return -1; } >> #endif >> =20 >> -void program_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs) >> +DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(program_check_exception) >> { >> enum ctx_state prev_state =3D exception_enter(); >> unsigned int reason =3D get_reason(regs); >> @@ -1587,14 +1599,14 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(program_check_exception); >> * This occurs when running in hypervisor mode on POWER6 or later >> * and an illegal instruction is encountered. >> */ >> -void emulation_assist_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) >> +DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(emulation_assist_interrupt) >> { >> regs->msr |=3D REASON_ILLEGAL; >> program_check_exception(regs); >=20 > Is it correct that an INTERRUPT_HANDLER calls another INTERRUPT_HANDLER ? No you're right, I'll have to send a patch. Thanks, Nick