From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D73C433C1 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E21D619B6 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:40:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8E21D619B6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80B0140DCE; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:39:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA579140D90 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:39:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F6rJw01KRzPryx for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:37:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:39:50 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , , Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:40:15 +0800 Message-ID: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Currently, some examples check that the port is on the same NUMA node as the polling thread for best performance. The method is to compare the socket id of port and that of current core. If the result is different, warning info will be given. But it ignores the port which is from numa node 0, that is, no warning info will be given if the port is from numa node 0, and this set of patches will fix it. Min Hu (Connor) (3): examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core examples/l2fwd-cat: fix check of port and core examples/skeleton: fix check of port and core examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c | 2 +- examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c | 2 +- examples/skeleton/basicfwd.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4