All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org, andreas@oehler-net.de,
	eranian@google.com, osk@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mark@voidzero.net, steve.wahl@hpe.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove uncore extra PCI dev HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:22:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618521764-100923-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

There may be a kernel panic on the Haswell server and the Broadwell
server, if the snbep_pci2phy_map_init() return error.

The uncore_extra_pci_dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3] is used in the cpu_init() to
detect the existence of the SBOX, which is a MSR type of PMON unit.
The uncore_extra_pci_dev is allocated in the uncore_pci_init(). If the
snbep_pci2phy_map_init() returns error, perf doesn't initialize the
PCI type of the PMON units, so the uncore_extra_pci_dev will not be
allocated. But perf may continue initializing the MSR type of PMON
units. A null dereference kernel panic will be triggered.

The sockets in a Haswell server or a Broadwell server are identical.
Only need to detect the existence of the SBOX once.
Current perf probes all available PCU devices and stores them into the
uncore_extra_pci_dev. It's unnecessary.
Use the pci_get_device() to replace the uncore_extra_pci_dev. Only
detect the existence of the SBOX on the first available PCU device once.

Factor out hswep_has_limit_sbox(), since the Haswell server and the
Broadwell server uses the same way to detect the existence of the SBOX.

Add some macros to replace the magic number.

Fixes: 5306c31c5733 ("perf/x86/uncore/hsw-ep: Handle systems with only two SBOXes")
Reported-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 61 +++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index b79951d..9b89376 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1159,7 +1159,6 @@ enum {
 	SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT0_FILTER,
 	SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT1_FILTER,
 	BDX_PCI_QPI_PORT2_FILTER,
-	HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3,
 };
 
 static int snbep_qpi_hw_config(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
@@ -2857,22 +2856,33 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *hswep_msr_uncores[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
-void hswep_uncore_cpu_init(void)
+#define HSWEP_PCU_DID			0x2fc0
+#define HSWEP_PCU_CAPID4_OFFET		0x94
+#define hswep_get_chop(_cap)		(((_cap) >> 6) & 0x3)
+
+static bool hswep_has_limit_sbox(unsigned int device)
 {
-	int pkg = boot_cpu_data.logical_proc_id;
+	struct pci_dev *dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, device, NULL);
+	u32 capid4;
+
+	if (!dev)
+		return false;
+
+	pci_read_config_dword(dev, HSWEP_PCU_CAPID4_OFFET, &capid4);
+	if (!hswep_get_chop(capid4))
+		return true;
 
+	return false;
+}
+
+void hswep_uncore_cpu_init(void)
+{
 	if (hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
 		hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
 
 	/* Detect 6-8 core systems with only two SBOXes */
-	if (uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3]) {
-		u32 capid4;
-
-		pci_read_config_dword(uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3],
-				      0x94, &capid4);
-		if (((capid4 >> 6) & 0x3) == 0)
-			hswep_uncore_sbox.num_boxes = 2;
-	}
+	if (hswep_has_limit_sbox(HSWEP_PCU_DID))
+		hswep_uncore_sbox.num_boxes = 2;
 
 	uncore_msr_uncores = hswep_msr_uncores;
 }
@@ -3135,11 +3145,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id hswep_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
 		.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
 						   SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT1_FILTER),
 	},
-	{ /* PCU.3 (for Capability registers) */
-		PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2fc0),
-		.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
-						   HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3),
-	},
 	{ /* end: all zeroes */ }
 };
 
@@ -3231,27 +3236,18 @@ static struct event_constraint bdx_uncore_pcu_constraints[] = {
 	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
 };
 
+#define BDX_PCU_DID			0x6fc0
+
 void bdx_uncore_cpu_init(void)
 {
-	int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(boot_cpu_data.phys_proc_id);
-
 	if (bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
 		bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
 	uncore_msr_uncores = bdx_msr_uncores;
 
-	/* BDX-DE doesn't have SBOX */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 86) {
-		uncore_msr_uncores[BDX_MSR_UNCORE_SBOX] = NULL;
 	/* Detect systems with no SBOXes */
-	} else if (uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3]) {
-		struct pci_dev *pdev;
-		u32 capid4;
-
-		pdev = uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3];
-		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0x94, &capid4);
-		if (((capid4 >> 6) & 0x3) == 0)
-			bdx_msr_uncores[BDX_MSR_UNCORE_SBOX] = NULL;
-	}
+	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 86) || hswep_has_limit_sbox(BDX_PCU_DID))
+		uncore_msr_uncores[BDX_MSR_UNCORE_SBOX] = NULL;
+
 	hswep_uncore_pcu.constraints = bdx_uncore_pcu_constraints;
 }
 
@@ -3472,11 +3468,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id bdx_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
 		.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
 						   BDX_PCI_QPI_PORT2_FILTER),
 	},
-	{ /* PCU.3 (for Capability registers) */
-		PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0),
-		.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
-						   HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3),
-	},
 	{ /* end: all zeroes */ }
 };
 
-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 21:22 kan.liang [this message]
2021-04-19 20:38 ` [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove uncore extra PCI dev HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3 Steve Wahl
2021-04-22  7:29 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1618521764-100923-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andreas@oehler-net.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@voidzero.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osk@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.