From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325AFC433B4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA672613CA for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:47:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA672613CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugs.launchpad.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgKtU-00079d-DC for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:25:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgKpQ-00029y-Vv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:21:08 -0400 Received: from indium.canonical.com ([91.189.90.7]:58552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgKpO-0000p8-A6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:21:08 -0400 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by indium.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93 #5 (Debian)) id 1lgKpL-00018w-2m for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:21:03 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409C02E81AF for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:21:01 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 05:15:16 -0000 From: Thomas Huth <1705118@bugs.launchpad.net> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: bug X-Launchpad-Bug: product=qemu; status=Incomplete; importance=Undecided; assignee=None; X-Launchpad-Bug-Tags: linux-user X-Launchpad-Bug-Information-Type: Public X-Launchpad-Bug-Private: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Commenters: bruno-clisp pmaydell th-huth X-Launchpad-Bug-Reporter: Bruno Haible (bruno-clisp) X-Launchpad-Bug-Modifier: Thomas Huth (th-huth) References: <150041005567.6544.17518405784140614257.malonedeb@gac.canonical.com> Message-Id: <162071011634.10453.12448025463739754254.malone@chaenomeles.canonical.com> Subject: [Bug 1705118] Re: qemu user mode: rt signals not implemented for sparc guests X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (QEMU) @qemu-devel-ml X-Launchpad-Message-For: qemu-devel-ml Precedence: bulk X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="dccd804998035922efb3da0a725ecc923e2255f3"; Instance="production" X-Launchpad-Hash: 20d1cddc86061feb7566f89806dd4e868c6ea353 Received-SPF: none client-ip=91.189.90.7; envelope-from=bounces@canonical.com; helo=indium.canonical.com X-Spam_score_int: -65 X-Spam_score: -6.6 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bug 1705118 <1705118@bugs.launchpad.net> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" The QEMU project is currently moving its bug tracking to another system. For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be closed already. Thus we are setting the bug state to "Incomplete" now. If the bug has already been fixed in the latest upstream version of QEMU, then please close this ticket as "Fix released". If it is not fixed yet and you think that this bug report here is still valid, then you have two options: 1) If you already have an account on gitlab.com, please open a new ticket for this problem in our new tracker here: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues and then close this ticket here on Launchpad (or let it expire auto- matically after 60 days). Please mention the URL of this bug ticket on Launchpad in the new ticket on GitLab. 2) If you don't have an account on gitlab.com and don't intend to get one, but still would like to keep this ticket opened, then please switch the state back to "New" or "Confirmed" within the next 60 days (other- wise it will get closed as "Expired"). We will then eventually migrate the ticket automatically to the new system (but you won't be the reporter of the bug in the new system and thus you won't get notified on changes anymore). Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. ** Changed in: qemu Status: Confirmed =3D> Incomplete -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705118 Title: qemu user mode: rt signals not implemented for sparc guests Status in QEMU: Incomplete Bug description: The documentation says that qemu in user mode supports POSIX signal handling. Catching SIGSEGV according to POSIX, however, does not work on ppc, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, sparc64. It does work, however, on aarch64, alpha, arm, hppa, m68k, mips, mips64, sh4. How to reproduce: The attached program runs fine (exits with code 0) on - real hardware Linux/PowerPC64 (in 32-bit and 64-bit mode), - real hardware Linux/PowerPC64LE, - qemu-system-s390x emulated Linux/s390x, - real hardware Linux/SPARC64. $ gcc -O -Wall testsigsegv.c; ./a.out; echo $? 0 For ppc: $ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -o testsigsegv-p= pc $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-ppc testsigsegv-ppc $ echo $? 3 For ppc64: $ powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -o testsigsegv= -ppc64 $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-ppc64 testsigsegv-ppc64 $ echo $? 3 For ppc64le: $ powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -o testsigse= gv-ppc64le $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-ppc64le testsigsegv-ppc64le $ echo $? 3 For s390x: $ s390x-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -o testsigsegv-s39= 0x $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-s390x testsigsegv-s390x $ echo $? 3 $ s390x-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -DAVOID_LINUX_S390= X_COMPAT -o testsigsegv-s390x-a $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-s390x testsigsegv-s390x-a $ echo $? 0 So, the test fails here because the Linux/s390x kernel omits the least significant 12 bits of the fault address in the 'si_addr' field. But qemu-s390x is not compatible with the Linux/s390x behaviour: it puts the complete fault address in the 'si_addr' field. For sparc64: $ sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc-5 -O -Wall -static testsigsegv.c -o testsigsegv-s= parc64 $ ~/inst-qemu/2.9.0/bin/qemu-sparc64 testsigsegv-sparc64 Segmentation fault (core dumped) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1705118/+subscriptions