From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C46AC47087 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B760161429 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B760161429 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ADMo0oTzXXwyKnJQHSk/W1TLKQVCtSqTxL/joWQ+3C8=; b=e5jhUNCVVUUcml M1NceVQVtGHa/EOaNgqcdUpK+IuasR5jMCqNyNTq0ODE4Zh5jSHtzID1y6Eqk02fwJ2zvS8029yVr ZXkuJckg/ihaS18+zBDB/NQXiOU3BoC1KHZ32rgZI6zAZ8SqvPW788pDFxzziLj0WLDasCX9rY7Fe kv2FArPslklT71xIU2sO6dShZkWELtSIVEJq22KuBazkDu9ANy4udPX0znStnDHkpzvbqID6VHMk6 LxGCA43SsqpnnqigMPBFUHGARfp/5ekGXpyJVnjWPX4aXqyYuQWdmg4E2OORFGau2AXALGogLCG1U pDUGpZ+xxmm+D64beyDw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lljLR-00A8a1-AH; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:29 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lljLC-00A8Vk-T2; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:16 +0000 X-UUID: bdd876b71a914d5db890537ccc2ce7c6-20210525 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=u4rffWvgYfrSTYJgDsvIRaBpj5Ge6ENMgegLquz8jFk=; b=ZdW5iot1SLyXV5xbSP2fBY3MznQp39G1jiYTzunWyMEgr8b/A/CHrVV+5Tq4wKH88O8/PS4X320i0DDDVv9HXPOg7IbqtMoPOu69UGxAc77j0Om+7Sn1rn5AGwN249Xyr4LLhJzXCpyiwn37Pj7TpmFiaZo/B+kXHzGPT/UVxto=; X-UUID: bdd876b71a914d5db890537ccc2ce7c6-20210525 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1721995229; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:32:11 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs07n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.16) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:22:08 -0700 Received: from mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.39) by mtkmbs07n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.4] (172.21.77.4) by mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 Message-ID: <1621995727.29827.1.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/8] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor From: andrew-sh.cheng To: Chanwoo Choi CC: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , , , , , , , Sibi Sankar Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1616499241-4906-1-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <233a3bd6-7ab1-5da2-9184-a745eb253d86@samsung.com> <1617177820.15067.1.camel@mtksdaap41> <2ae8604d-0da6-4243-1b92-81b3917d7d48@samsung.com> <1617195800.18432.3.camel@mtksdaap41> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210525_193214_972719_39158DC3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 33.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:47 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 4/1/21 9:16 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > On 3/31/21 10:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 17:35 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>> On 3/31/21 5:27 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On 3/31/21 5:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You are missing to add these patches to linux-pm mailing list. > >>>>>> Need to send them to linu-pm ML. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, before received this series, I tried to clean-up these patches > >>>>>> on testing branch[1]. So that I add my comment with my clean-up case. > >>>>>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!zIrzeDp9vPnm1_SDzVPuzqdHn3zWie9DnfBXaA-j9-CSrVc6aR9_rJQQiw81_CgAPh9XRRs$ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And 'Saravana Kannan ' is wrong email address. > >>>>>> Please update the email or drop this email. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Chanwoo, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you for the advices. > >>>>> I will resend patch v9 (add to linux-pm ML), remove this patch, and note > >>>>> that my patch set base on > >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>>> > >>>> I has not yet test this patch[1] on devfreq-testing-passive-gov branch. > >>>> So that if possible, I'd like you to test your patches with this patch[1] > >>>> and then if there is no problem, could you send the next patches with patch[1]? > >>>> > >>>> [1]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov&id=39c80d11a8f42dd63ecea1e0df595a0ceb83b454__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJR2cQqZs$ > >>> > >>> > >>> Sorry for the confusion. I make the devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] > >>> branch based on latest devfreq-next branch. > >>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>> > >>> First of all, if possible, I want to test them[1] with your patches in this series. > >>> And then if there are no any problem, please let me know. After confirmed from you, > >>> I'll send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >>> How about that? > >>> > >> Hi Chanwoo~ > >> > >> We will use this on Google Chrome project. > >> Google Hsin-Yi has test your patch + my patch set v8 [2~8] > >> > >> make sure cci devfreqs runs with cpufreq. > >> suspend resume > >> speedometer2 benchmark > >> It is okay. > >> > >> Please send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >> > >> I will send patch v9 base on yours latter. > > > > Thanks for your test. I'll send the patches today. > > I'm sorry for delay because when I tested the patches > for devfreq parent type on Odroid-xu3, there are some problem > related to lazy linking of OPP. So I'm trying to analyze them. > Unfortunately, we need to postpone these patches to next linux > version. > Hi Chanwoo Choi~ It is said that you are busy on another task recently. May I know your plan on this patch? Thank you. > > [snip] > _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563B6C4707F for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07792610CE for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:35:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07792610CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ih4WgGjA8Ld0pCrJDBb/OCCd67/kfIQA8shOilT7Qm4=; b=mnKhna/BpVhRe5 YIm4PqK9aYnWAVCmf7zdKXjcMgV4KtamVTSEC3ktPDhHI5k/Fp23TbqFxmbu11aUdb7VB2yBuy+kT ZpxWHfLtRLC7+yrxJbIJwSPtP9FawaRTe0b0sUB98DL90saAo209hAQhmqM1lZ9MCEqJDyPLitOk+ GStmFw/Hg6teYUX52vnad/ojqRamnqxrkxwaV9lJOuw9t1xDMDAd1TUnbKKJphBAneFgOarVRNFcf Zs7ZDIqbe+h2kOfn8juWb8vhD69OnVVzVEzAW+PqNmuVzw88TGBNypIbZk0APZ1W/MggGomNGri/f UNlyB6R/KncFIutEZQ2Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lljLH-00A8XU-1k; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:19 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lljLC-00A8Vk-T2; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:32:16 +0000 X-UUID: bdd876b71a914d5db890537ccc2ce7c6-20210525 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=u4rffWvgYfrSTYJgDsvIRaBpj5Ge6ENMgegLquz8jFk=; b=ZdW5iot1SLyXV5xbSP2fBY3MznQp39G1jiYTzunWyMEgr8b/A/CHrVV+5Tq4wKH88O8/PS4X320i0DDDVv9HXPOg7IbqtMoPOu69UGxAc77j0Om+7Sn1rn5AGwN249Xyr4LLhJzXCpyiwn37Pj7TpmFiaZo/B+kXHzGPT/UVxto=; X-UUID: bdd876b71a914d5db890537ccc2ce7c6-20210525 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1721995229; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:32:11 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs07n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.16) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 25 May 2021 19:22:08 -0700 Received: from mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.39) by mtkmbs07n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.4] (172.21.77.4) by mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 Message-ID: <1621995727.29827.1.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/8] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor From: andrew-sh.cheng To: Chanwoo Choi CC: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , , , , , , , Sibi Sankar Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:22:07 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1616499241-4906-1-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <233a3bd6-7ab1-5da2-9184-a745eb253d86@samsung.com> <1617177820.15067.1.camel@mtksdaap41> <2ae8604d-0da6-4243-1b92-81b3917d7d48@samsung.com> <1617195800.18432.3.camel@mtksdaap41> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210525_193214_972719_39158DC3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 33.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:47 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 4/1/21 9:16 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > On 3/31/21 10:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 17:35 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>> On 3/31/21 5:27 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On 3/31/21 5:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You are missing to add these patches to linux-pm mailing list. > >>>>>> Need to send them to linu-pm ML. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, before received this series, I tried to clean-up these patches > >>>>>> on testing branch[1]. So that I add my comment with my clean-up case. > >>>>>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!zIrzeDp9vPnm1_SDzVPuzqdHn3zWie9DnfBXaA-j9-CSrVc6aR9_rJQQiw81_CgAPh9XRRs$ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And 'Saravana Kannan ' is wrong email address. > >>>>>> Please update the email or drop this email. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Chanwoo, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you for the advices. > >>>>> I will resend patch v9 (add to linux-pm ML), remove this patch, and note > >>>>> that my patch set base on > >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>>> > >>>> I has not yet test this patch[1] on devfreq-testing-passive-gov branch. > >>>> So that if possible, I'd like you to test your patches with this patch[1] > >>>> and then if there is no problem, could you send the next patches with patch[1]? > >>>> > >>>> [1]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov&id=39c80d11a8f42dd63ecea1e0df595a0ceb83b454__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJR2cQqZs$ > >>> > >>> > >>> Sorry for the confusion. I make the devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] > >>> branch based on latest devfreq-next branch. > >>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>> > >>> First of all, if possible, I want to test them[1] with your patches in this series. > >>> And then if there are no any problem, please let me know. After confirmed from you, > >>> I'll send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >>> How about that? > >>> > >> Hi Chanwoo~ > >> > >> We will use this on Google Chrome project. > >> Google Hsin-Yi has test your patch + my patch set v8 [2~8] > >> > >> make sure cci devfreqs runs with cpufreq. > >> suspend resume > >> speedometer2 benchmark > >> It is okay. > >> > >> Please send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >> > >> I will send patch v9 base on yours latter. > > > > Thanks for your test. I'll send the patches today. > > I'm sorry for delay because when I tested the patches > for devfreq parent type on Odroid-xu3, there are some problem > related to lazy linking of OPP. So I'm trying to analyze them. > Unfortunately, we need to postpone these patches to next linux > version. > Hi Chanwoo Choi~ It is said that you are busy on another task recently. May I know your plan on this patch? Thank you. > > [snip] > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel