From: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: <dledford@redhat.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 for-next 00/12] RDMA: Use refcount_t for reference counting
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:37:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1622194663-2383-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> (raw)
There are some refcnt in type of atomic_t in RDMA subsystem, almost all of
them is wrote before the refcount_t is acheived in kernel. refcount_t is
better than integer for reference counting, it will WARN on
overflow/underflow and avoid use-after-free risks.
Changes since v3:
* Drop the rdmavt patch because the refcount_t is not suitable for the
logic.
* Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1621925504-33019-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
Changes since v2:
* Drop i40iw related parts because this driver will be removed soon.
* Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1621590825-60693-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
Changes since v1:
* Split these patches by variable granularity.
* Fix a warning on refcount of struct mcast_group.
* Add a patch on rdmavt.
* Drop "RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t APIs for HEM".
* Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1620958299-4869-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
Weihang Li (12):
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
iwcm_id_private
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
iwpm_admin_data
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
ib_mad_snoop_private
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
mcast_member
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
mcast_port
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
mcast_group
RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
ib_uverbs_device
RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting
RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ reference
counting
RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP reference counting
RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for reference counting
RDMA/ipoib: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for reference counting
drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c | 9 ++++---
drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/iwpm_util.c | 12 ++++++----
drivers/infiniband/core/iwpm_util.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/mad_priv.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/multicast.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c | 12 +++++-----
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cq.c | 6 ++---
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/ev.c | 8 +++----
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cq.c | 8 +++----
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 6 ++---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 12 +++++-----
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 8 +++----
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h | 4 ++--
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 8 +++----
17 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 9:37 Weihang Li [this message]
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 01/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwcm_id_private Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 02/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwpm_admin_data Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 03/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_mad_snoop_private Weihang Li
2021-06-08 18:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 3:27 ` liweihang
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 04/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_member Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 05/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_port Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 06/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_group Weihang Li
2021-06-08 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 3:45 ` liweihang
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 07/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_uverbs_device Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 08/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 09/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 10/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 11/12] RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 12/12] RDMA/ipoib: " Weihang Li
2021-06-08 18:08 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 00/12] RDMA: Use refcount_t " Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1622194663-2383-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com \
--to=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.