From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06814C43331 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D45C820714 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D45C820714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH4TB-00023o-CX; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:13 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH4T9-00023j-O3 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:11 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 14e9042e-6e8e-11ea-85de-12813bfff9fa Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 14e9042e-6e8e-11ea-85de-12813bfff9fa; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46E5AC5B; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:45:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Andrew Cooper References: <6fa81b4d-528d-5c33-50c5-a18396b4383a@suse.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <162583f8-2b2e-e9c9-1fcf-8fff629d0cb0@suse.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:45:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] x86emul: further work X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Paul Durrant , Wei Liu , Roger Pau Monne Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On 25.03.2020 12:41, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 24/03/2020 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for >> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least >> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later. >> >> Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on >> "libx86/CPUID: fix (not just) leaf 7 processing", while at >> least patch 2 contextually depends on "x86emul: disable >> FPU/MMX/SIMD insn emulation when !HVM". >> >> 1: x86emul: support AVX512_BF16 insns >> 2: x86emul: support MOVDIRI insn >> 3: x86: determine HAVE_AS_* just once > > I have (in this order when threaded): > > 02/10 Support AVX512_BF16 > 02/10 Support MOVDIRI > 01/10 Support AVX512_BF16 > 03/10 Determine HAS_AS_* > > To a first approximation, the two AVX512_BF16 ones look identical, so > I'm going to assume that the first one (chronologically) was the error. Yes indeed, sorry. Jan