[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Stop pre-zeroing batch commands

* [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Stop pre-zeroing batch commands
@ 2021-08-11 15:49 ` John Garry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2021-08-11 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: will, robin.murphy
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, thunder.leizhen, linuxarm,
	joro, John Garry

Pre-zeroing the batched commands structure is inefficient, as individual
commands are zeroed later in arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(). The size is quite
large and commonly most commands won't even be used:

	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
345c:	52800001 	mov	w1, #0x0                   	// #0
3460:	d2808102 	mov	x2, #0x408                 	// #1032
3464:	910143a0 	add	x0, x29, #0x50
3468:	94000000 	bl	0 <memset>

Stop pre-zeroing the complete structure and only zero the num member.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index cbc57edfa4e2..2a4f3fb938f6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_cd(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 	size_t i;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct arm_smmu_master *master;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
+	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds;
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd = {
 		.opcode	= CMDQ_OP_CFGI_CD,
@@ -1092,6 +1092,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_cd(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 		},
 	};
 
+	cmds.num = 0;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
 		for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
@@ -1908,7 +1910,7 @@ int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd;
 	struct arm_smmu_master *master;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
+	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds;
 
 	if (!(smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_ATS))
 		return 0;
@@ -1932,6 +1934,8 @@ int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
 
 	arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(ssid, iova, size, &cmd);
 
+	cmds.num = 0;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
 		if (!master->ats_enabled)
@@ -1980,7 +1984,7 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *cmd,
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
 	unsigned long end = iova + size, num_pages = 0, tg = 0;
 	size_t inv_range = granule;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
+	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds;
 
 	if (!size)
 		return;
@@ -1998,6 +2002,8 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *cmd,
 		num_pages = size >> tg;
 	}
 
+	cmds.num = 0;
+
 	while (iova < end) {
 		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV) {
 			/*
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread