All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: song@kernel.org
Cc: ncroxon@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, guoqing.jiang@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2] md/raid10: Remove rcu_dereference when it doesn't need rcu lock to protect
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:57:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629266268-3624-1-git-send-email-xni@redhat.com> (raw)

One warning message is triggered like this:
[  695.110751] =============================
[  695.131439] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[  695.151389] 4.18.0-319.el8.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted
[  695.174413] -----------------------------
[  695.192603] drivers/md/raid10.c:1776 suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[  695.225107] other info that might help us debug this:
[  695.260940] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[  695.290157] no locks held by mkfs.xfs/10186.

In the first loop of function raid10_handle_discard. It already
determines which disk need to handle discard request and add the
rdev reference count rdev->nr_pending. So the conf->mirrors will
not change until all bios come back from underlayer disks. It
doesn't need to use rcu_dereference to get rdev.

Fixes: d30588b2731f ('md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request')
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
---
V2: Fix comment style problem

 drivers/md/raid10.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 16977e8..d5d9233 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1712,6 +1712,11 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 	} else
 		r10_bio->master_bio = (struct bio *)first_r10bio;
 
+	/*
+	 * first select target devices under rcu_lock and
+	 * inc refcount on their rdev.  Record them by setting
+	 * bios[x] to bio
+	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for (disk = 0; disk < geo->raid_disks; disk++) {
 		struct md_rdev *rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[disk].rdev);
@@ -1743,9 +1748,6 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 	for (disk = 0; disk < geo->raid_disks; disk++) {
 		sector_t dev_start, dev_end;
 		struct bio *mbio, *rbio = NULL;
-		struct md_rdev *rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[disk].rdev);
-		struct md_rdev *rrdev = rcu_dereference(
-			conf->mirrors[disk].replacement);
 
 		/*
 		 * Now start to calculate the start and end address for each disk.
@@ -1775,9 +1777,12 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 
 		/*
 		 * It only handles discard bio which size is >= stripe size, so
-		 * dev_end > dev_start all the time
+		 * dev_end > dev_start all the time.
+		 * It doesn't need to use rcu lock to get rdev here. We already
+		 * add rdev->nr_pending in the first loop.
 		 */
 		if (r10_bio->devs[disk].bio) {
+			struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[disk].rdev;
 			mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, &mddev->bio_set);
 			mbio->bi_end_io = raid10_end_discard_request;
 			mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
@@ -1790,6 +1795,7 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 			bio_endio(mbio);
 		}
 		if (r10_bio->devs[disk].repl_bio) {
+			struct md_rdev *rrdev = conf->mirrors[disk].replacement;
 			rbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, &mddev->bio_set);
 			rbio->bi_end_io = raid10_end_discard_request;
 			rbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
-- 
2.7.5


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-18  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18  5:57 Xiao Ni [this message]
2021-08-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v2] md/raid10: Remove rcu_dereference when it doesn't need rcu lock to protect Song Liu
2021-08-26 16:18   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1629266268-3624-1-git-send-email-xni@redhat.com \
    --to=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncroxon@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.