From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CF1C433EF for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CB8610D1 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244762AbhIXIfI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:35:08 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3855 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244742AbhIXIfH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:35:07 -0400 Received: from fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HG4xD5j3Hz67Xh8; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:30:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:33:32 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.58) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:33:30 +0100 From: John Garry To: CC: , , , , , "John Garry" Subject: [PATCH v4 01/13] blk-mq: Change rqs check in blk_mq_free_rqs() Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:28:18 +0800 Message-ID: <1632472110-244938-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1632472110-244938-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> References: <1632472110-244938-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.58] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org The original code in commit 24d2f90309b23 ("blk-mq: split out tag initialization, support shared tags") would check tags->rqs is non-NULL and then dereference tags->rqs[]. Then in commit 2af8cbe30531 ("blk-mq: split tag ->rqs[] into two"), we started to dereference tags->static_rqs[], but continued to check non-NULL tags->rqs. Check tags->static_rqs as non-NULL instead, which is more logical. Signed-off-by: John Garry Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke --- block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 108a352051be..2316ff27c1f5 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags, { struct page *page; - if (tags->rqs && set->ops->exit_request) { + if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) { int i; for (i = 0; i < tags->nr_tags; i++) { -- 2.26.2