All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
@ 2022-01-14 19:33 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2022-01-14 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx
  Cc: Stuart Summers, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio, Alan Previn,
	John Harrison, dri-devel

Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and
the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no
longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC
deprivilege.
On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer
programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already
set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit
with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by
sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't
a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller
chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the
checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max
programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers
have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
index e6bd66d6ce5a..cdb47c2291c8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@
 #define   GUC_ENABLE_MIA_CLOCK_GATING		(1<<15)
 #define   GUC_GEN10_SHIM_WC_ENABLE		(1<<21)
 
+#define GUC_SHIM_CONTROL2		_MMIO(0xc068)
+#define   GUC_IS_PRIVILEGED		(1<<29)
+
 #define GUC_SEND_INTERRUPT		_MMIO(0xc4c8)
 #define   GUC_SEND_TRIGGER		  (1<<0)
 #define GEN11_GUC_HOST_INTERRUPT	_MMIO(0x1901f0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 6caec2eca8cd..4fe6e1444f17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1565,6 +1565,9 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 #define INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv) \
 	(drm_WARN_ON(&(dev_priv)->drm, !HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)), !(dev_priv)->params.disable_display)
 
+#define HAS_GUC_DEPRIVILEGE(dev_priv) \
+	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_guc_deprivilege)
+
 static inline bool run_as_guest(void)
 {
 	return !hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_NATIVE);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 8261b6455747..983546d5f415 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -1045,6 +1045,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
 	.graphics.rel = 55,
 	.media.rel = 55,
 	PLATFORM(INTEL_DG2),
+	.has_guc_deprivilege = 1,
 	.has_64k_pages = 1,
 	.platform_engine_mask =
 		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
 		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
+	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
+	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
+	 */
+	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
+		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;
 }
 
 void intel_driver_caps_print(const struct intel_driver_caps *caps,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 3699b1c539ea..abf1e103c558 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
 	func(has_reset_engine); \
 	func(has_global_mocs); \
 	func(has_gt_uc); \
+	func(has_guc_deprivilege); \
 	func(has_l3_dpf); \
 	func(has_llc); \
 	func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
index f06d21005106..322fb9eeb880 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 /* Default WOPCM size is 2MB from Gen11, 1MB on previous platforms */
 #define GEN11_WOPCM_SIZE		SZ_2M
 #define GEN9_WOPCM_SIZE			SZ_1M
+#define MAX_WOPCM_SIZE			SZ_8M
 /* 16KB WOPCM (RSVD WOPCM) is reserved from HuC firmware top. */
 #define WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE		SZ_16K
 
@@ -207,6 +208,14 @@ static bool __wopcm_regs_locked(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool __wopcm_regs_writable(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
+{
+	if (!HAS_GUC_DEPRIVILEGE(uncore->i915))
+		return true;
+
+	return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GUC_SHIM_CONTROL2) & GUC_IS_PRIVILEGED;
+}
+
 /**
  * intel_wopcm_init() - Initialize the WOPCM structure.
  * @wopcm: pointer to intel_wopcm.
@@ -224,18 +233,19 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	u32 guc_fw_size = intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size(&gt->uc.guc.fw);
 	u32 huc_fw_size = intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size(&gt->uc.huc.fw);
 	u32 ctx_rsvd = context_reserved_size(i915);
+	u32 wopcm_size = wopcm->size;
 	u32 guc_wopcm_base;
 	u32 guc_wopcm_size;
 
 	if (!guc_fw_size)
 		return;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm_size);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.base);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(ctx_rsvd + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE >= wopcm->size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm_size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm_size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(ctx_rsvd + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE >= wopcm_size);
 
 	if (i915_inject_probe_failure(i915))
 		return;
@@ -243,6 +253,24 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	if (__wopcm_regs_locked(gt->uncore, &guc_wopcm_base, &guc_wopcm_size)) {
 		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "GuC WOPCM is already locked [%uK, %uK)\n",
 			guc_wopcm_base / SZ_1K, guc_wopcm_size / SZ_1K);
+		/*
+		 * Note that to keep things simple (i.e. avoid different
+		 * defines per platform) our WOPCM math doesn't always use the
+		 * actual WOPCM size, but a value that is less or equal to it.
+		 * This is perfectly fine when i915 programs the registers, but
+		 * on platforms with GuC deprivilege the registers are not
+		 * writable from i915 and are instead pre-programmed by the
+		 * bios/IFWI, so there might be a mismatch of sizes.
+		 * Instead of handling the size difference, we trust that the
+		 * programmed values make sense and disable the relevant check
+		 * by using the maximum possible WOPCM size in the verification
+		 * math. In the extremely unlikely case that the registers
+		 * were pre-programmed with an invalid value, we will still
+		 * gracefully fail later during the GuC/HuC dma.
+		 */
+		if (!__wopcm_regs_writable(gt->uncore))
+			wopcm_size = MAX_WOPCM_SIZE;
+
 		goto check;
 	}
 
@@ -257,17 +285,17 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	 * Need to clamp guc_wopcm_base now to make sure the following math is
 	 * correct. Formal check of whole WOPCM layout will be done below.
 	 */
-	guc_wopcm_base = min(guc_wopcm_base, wopcm->size - ctx_rsvd);
+	guc_wopcm_base = min(guc_wopcm_base, wopcm_size - ctx_rsvd);
 
 	/* Aligned remainings of usable WOPCM space can be assigned to GuC. */
-	guc_wopcm_size = wopcm->size - ctx_rsvd - guc_wopcm_base;
+	guc_wopcm_size = wopcm_size - ctx_rsvd - guc_wopcm_base;
 	guc_wopcm_size &= GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_MASK;
 
 	drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Calculated GuC WOPCM [%uK, %uK)\n",
 		guc_wopcm_base / SZ_1K, guc_wopcm_size / SZ_1K);
 
 check:
-	if (__check_layout(i915, wopcm->size, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size,
+	if (__check_layout(i915, wopcm_size, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size,
 			   guc_fw_size, huc_fw_size)) {
 		wopcm->guc.base = guc_wopcm_base;
 		wopcm->guc.size = guc_wopcm_size;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
@ 2022-01-14 19:33 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2022-01-14 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Alan Previn, dri-devel

Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and
the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no
longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC
deprivilege.
On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer
programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already
set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit
with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by
sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't
a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller
chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the
checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max
programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers
have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
index e6bd66d6ce5a..cdb47c2291c8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@
 #define   GUC_ENABLE_MIA_CLOCK_GATING		(1<<15)
 #define   GUC_GEN10_SHIM_WC_ENABLE		(1<<21)
 
+#define GUC_SHIM_CONTROL2		_MMIO(0xc068)
+#define   GUC_IS_PRIVILEGED		(1<<29)
+
 #define GUC_SEND_INTERRUPT		_MMIO(0xc4c8)
 #define   GUC_SEND_TRIGGER		  (1<<0)
 #define GEN11_GUC_HOST_INTERRUPT	_MMIO(0x1901f0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 6caec2eca8cd..4fe6e1444f17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1565,6 +1565,9 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 #define INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv) \
 	(drm_WARN_ON(&(dev_priv)->drm, !HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)), !(dev_priv)->params.disable_display)
 
+#define HAS_GUC_DEPRIVILEGE(dev_priv) \
+	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_guc_deprivilege)
+
 static inline bool run_as_guest(void)
 {
 	return !hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_NATIVE);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 8261b6455747..983546d5f415 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -1045,6 +1045,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
 	.graphics.rel = 55,
 	.media.rel = 55,
 	PLATFORM(INTEL_DG2),
+	.has_guc_deprivilege = 1,
 	.has_64k_pages = 1,
 	.platform_engine_mask =
 		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
 		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
+	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
+	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
+	 */
+	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
+		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;
 }
 
 void intel_driver_caps_print(const struct intel_driver_caps *caps,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 3699b1c539ea..abf1e103c558 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
 	func(has_reset_engine); \
 	func(has_global_mocs); \
 	func(has_gt_uc); \
+	func(has_guc_deprivilege); \
 	func(has_l3_dpf); \
 	func(has_llc); \
 	func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
index f06d21005106..322fb9eeb880 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 /* Default WOPCM size is 2MB from Gen11, 1MB on previous platforms */
 #define GEN11_WOPCM_SIZE		SZ_2M
 #define GEN9_WOPCM_SIZE			SZ_1M
+#define MAX_WOPCM_SIZE			SZ_8M
 /* 16KB WOPCM (RSVD WOPCM) is reserved from HuC firmware top. */
 #define WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE		SZ_16K
 
@@ -207,6 +208,14 @@ static bool __wopcm_regs_locked(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool __wopcm_regs_writable(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
+{
+	if (!HAS_GUC_DEPRIVILEGE(uncore->i915))
+		return true;
+
+	return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GUC_SHIM_CONTROL2) & GUC_IS_PRIVILEGED;
+}
+
 /**
  * intel_wopcm_init() - Initialize the WOPCM structure.
  * @wopcm: pointer to intel_wopcm.
@@ -224,18 +233,19 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	u32 guc_fw_size = intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size(&gt->uc.guc.fw);
 	u32 huc_fw_size = intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size(&gt->uc.huc.fw);
 	u32 ctx_rsvd = context_reserved_size(i915);
+	u32 wopcm_size = wopcm->size;
 	u32 guc_wopcm_base;
 	u32 guc_wopcm_size;
 
 	if (!guc_fw_size)
 		return;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm_size);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.base);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(ctx_rsvd + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE >= wopcm->size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm_size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm_size);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(ctx_rsvd + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE >= wopcm_size);
 
 	if (i915_inject_probe_failure(i915))
 		return;
@@ -243,6 +253,24 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	if (__wopcm_regs_locked(gt->uncore, &guc_wopcm_base, &guc_wopcm_size)) {
 		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "GuC WOPCM is already locked [%uK, %uK)\n",
 			guc_wopcm_base / SZ_1K, guc_wopcm_size / SZ_1K);
+		/*
+		 * Note that to keep things simple (i.e. avoid different
+		 * defines per platform) our WOPCM math doesn't always use the
+		 * actual WOPCM size, but a value that is less or equal to it.
+		 * This is perfectly fine when i915 programs the registers, but
+		 * on platforms with GuC deprivilege the registers are not
+		 * writable from i915 and are instead pre-programmed by the
+		 * bios/IFWI, so there might be a mismatch of sizes.
+		 * Instead of handling the size difference, we trust that the
+		 * programmed values make sense and disable the relevant check
+		 * by using the maximum possible WOPCM size in the verification
+		 * math. In the extremely unlikely case that the registers
+		 * were pre-programmed with an invalid value, we will still
+		 * gracefully fail later during the GuC/HuC dma.
+		 */
+		if (!__wopcm_regs_writable(gt->uncore))
+			wopcm_size = MAX_WOPCM_SIZE;
+
 		goto check;
 	}
 
@@ -257,17 +285,17 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
 	 * Need to clamp guc_wopcm_base now to make sure the following math is
 	 * correct. Formal check of whole WOPCM layout will be done below.
 	 */
-	guc_wopcm_base = min(guc_wopcm_base, wopcm->size - ctx_rsvd);
+	guc_wopcm_base = min(guc_wopcm_base, wopcm_size - ctx_rsvd);
 
 	/* Aligned remainings of usable WOPCM space can be assigned to GuC. */
-	guc_wopcm_size = wopcm->size - ctx_rsvd - guc_wopcm_base;
+	guc_wopcm_size = wopcm_size - ctx_rsvd - guc_wopcm_base;
 	guc_wopcm_size &= GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_MASK;
 
 	drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Calculated GuC WOPCM [%uK, %uK)\n",
 		guc_wopcm_base / SZ_1K, guc_wopcm_size / SZ_1K);
 
 check:
-	if (__check_layout(i915, wopcm->size, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size,
+	if (__check_layout(i915, wopcm_size, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size,
 			   guc_fw_size, huc_fw_size)) {
 		wopcm->guc.base = guc_wopcm_base;
 		wopcm->guc.size = guc_wopcm_size;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  (?)
@ 2022-01-14 20:00 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2022-01-14 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98910/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
03db6d6cfb02 drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
-:14: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#14: 
sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't

-:36: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
#36: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h:98:
+#define   GUC_IS_PRIVILEGED		(1<<29)
                            		  ^

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 134 lines checked



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2022-01-14 20:01 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2022-01-14 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98910/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-01-14 20:26 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2022-01-14 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7014 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98910/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11088 -> Patchwork_22004
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/index.html

Participating hosts (50 -> 41)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-icl-u2 
  Missing    (10): fi-ilk-m540 shard-tglu fi-bsw-n3050 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-pnv-d510 shard-rkl shard-dg1 fi-bdw-samus 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22004 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@fork-compute0:
    - fi-blb-e6850:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-blb-e6850/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@fork-compute0.html

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@fork-gfx0:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109315]) +17 similar issues
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@fork-gfx0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3@smem:
    - fi-bdw-5557u:       [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([i915#146])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3@smem.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3@smem.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([i915#2190])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#111827]) +8 similar issues
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#109278]) +2 similar issues
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109285])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
    - fi-icl-u2:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#3301])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-icl-u2/igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
    - bat-dg1-6:          [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#4494]) -> [PASS][14]
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
    - bat-dg1-5:          [DMESG-FAIL][15] ([i915#4494]) -> [PASS][16]
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/bat-dg1-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/bat-dg1-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
    - fi-blb-e6850:       [DMESG-FAIL][17] ([i915#4528]) -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
    - fi-cml-u2:          [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#4269]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink:
    - fi-skl-6600u:       [INCOMPLETE][21] ([i915#4547]) -> [FAIL][22] ([i915#4547])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-skl-6600u/igt@gem_flink_basic@bad-flink.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - fi-skl-6600u:       [FAIL][23] ([i915#2722] / [i915#4312]) -> [FAIL][24] ([i915#4312])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/fi-skl-6600u/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/fi-skl-6600u/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109278]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
  [fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
  [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [i915#146]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/146
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#2722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2722
  [i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
  [i915#4269]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4269
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494
  [i915#4528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4528
  [i915#4547]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4547
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_11088 -> Patchwork_22004

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_11088: 31b826a55fd46e5e2fc21720a466946f9ccfe557 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6326: ec75f64fcbcf4aac58fbf1bf629e8f59b19db4ce @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_22004: 03db6d6cfb025dfa14f8964901fb026bb16bac52 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

03db6d6cfb02 drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8283 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-01-17 12:40 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2022-01-17 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30276 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98910/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11088_full -> Patchwork_22004_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22004_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_22004_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (13 -> 13)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22004_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@fences:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@fences.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_pm_rpm@fences.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible@a-edp1:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible@a-edp1.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible@a-edp1.html

  
#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglu-1/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglu-7/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html

  * igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-d-overlay-size-128:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][7] ([i915#1845]) -> [FAIL][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-2/igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-d-overlay-size-128.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-d-overlay-size-128.html

  * igt@perf_pmu@enable-race@bcs0:
    - {shard-rkl}:        NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][9] +2 similar issues
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-5/igt@perf_pmu@enable-race@bcs0.html

  * igt@prime_busy@hang@vecs0:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11]
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglu-1/igt@prime_busy@hang@vecs0.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglu-7/igt@prime_busy@hang@vecs0.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22004_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@feature_discovery@psr2:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#658])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html

  * igt@gem_create@create-massive:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#3002])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_create@create-massive.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@rcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][15] ([i915#794])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][16] -> [TIMEOUT][17] ([i915#3063])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us.html

  * igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-bb-first:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][18] -> [SKIP][19] ([i915#4525])
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-bb-first.html
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-bb-first.html

  * igt@gem_exec_capture@pi@vcs0:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([i915#4547])
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl4/igt@gem_exec_capture@pi@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][21] -> [FAIL][22] ([i915#2846])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][23] -> [FAIL][24] ([i915#2842])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][25] ([i915#2842])
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-rrul@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#2842])
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][28] -> [INCOMPLETE][29] ([i915#1895])
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked.html
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][30] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify-random:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +1 similar issue
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl5/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify-random.html

  * igt@gem_pread@exhaustion:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [WARN][32] ([i915#2658])
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html

  * igt@gem_spin_batch@legacy@vebox:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][33] -> [FAIL][34] ([i915#2898])
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-apl1/igt@gem_spin_batch@legacy@vebox.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl8/igt@gem_spin_batch@legacy@vebox.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][35] ([i915#3323])
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([i915#3323])
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][37] -> [DMESG-WARN][38] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-skl7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@shadow-peek:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([i915#2527] / [i915#2856])
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@gen9_exec_parse@shadow-peek.html
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([i915#2856])
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@shadow-peek.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][41] ([i915#454])
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][42] ([i915#454])
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][43] -> [SKIP][44] ([i915#4281])
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][45] -> [INCOMPLETE][46] ([i915#2411])
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglb5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@cursor.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777])
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl6/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777])
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl9/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][49] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) +3 similar issues
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][50] ([i915#3743])
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-hflip:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#111615])
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-primary-basic-yf_tiled_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][52] ([fdo#111615] / [i915#3689]) +1 similar issue
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-primary-basic-yf_tiled_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-bad-aux-stride-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109278]) +1 similar issue
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-bad-aux-stride-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-crc-primary-basic-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +4 similar issues
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-crc-primary-basic-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-bad-rotation-90-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +2 similar issues
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-bad-rotation-90-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +8 similar issues
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-after-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +9 similar issues
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-after-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][58] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +11 similar issues
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-0-75:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +2 similar issues
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-0-75.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-limited-range:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827])
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-limited-range.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-red-to-blue:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +1 similar issue
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-red-to-blue.html
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827])
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-red-to-blue.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@atomic:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][63] ([i915#1319])
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-32x10-sliding:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][64] ([i915#3359]) +3 similar issues
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-32x10-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-32x32-onscreen:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109271]) +3 similar issues
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-32x32-onscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][66] ([fdo#109271]) +170 similar issues
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-toggle:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][67] ([i915#2346]) +1 similar issue
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-toggle.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@short-busy-flip-before-cursor-toggle:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][69] ([i915#4103])
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@short-busy-flip-before-cursor-toggle.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-panning-interruptible:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109274])
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-panning-interruptible.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][71] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#111825])
   [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-panning-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank@b-edp1:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][72] ([i915#2122])
   [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank@b-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][73] -> [DMESG-WARN][74] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
   [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-apl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html
   [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile-downscaling:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][75] ([i915#2587])
   [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile-downscaling.html

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytile-downscaling:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][76] -> [SKIP][77] ([i915#3701])
   [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytile-downscaling.html
   [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytile-downscaling.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][78] -> [FAIL][79] ([i915#2546])
   [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-glk6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move.html
   [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-pwrite:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][80] ([fdo#109280] / [fdo#111825]) +3 similar issues
   [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-pwrite.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-indfb-msflip-blt:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109271]) +169 similar issues
   [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-indfb-msflip-blt.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
   [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][83] -> [DMESG-WARN][84] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
   [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
   [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][85] ([i915#265])
   [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-max:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][86] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues
   [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-max.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][87] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][88] -> [FAIL][89] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
   [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-max:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][90] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-max.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][91] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658])
   [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][92] -> [SKIP][93] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues
   [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt.html
   [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][94] -> [FAIL][95] ([i915#31])
   [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-glk7/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  * igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][96] ([IGT#2])
   [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl4/igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][97] -> [DMESG-WARN][98] ([i915#180] / [i915#295])
   [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
   [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-pixel-formats:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][99] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437]) +1 similar issue
   [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-pixel-formats.html
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][100] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437])
   [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl6/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-pixel-formats.html

  * igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-ctx-flip-skip-current-frame:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][101] ([fdo#109271]) +54 similar issues
   [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl6/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-ctx-flip-skip-current-frame.html

  * igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test_semaphore:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][102] ([fdo#109291])
   [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb5/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test_semaphore.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@create:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][103] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +2 similar issues
   [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl5/igt@sysfs_clients@create.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-3:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][104] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +1 similar issue
   [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl3/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-3.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@recycle-many:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][105] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994])
   [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-apl2/igt@sysfs_clients@recycle-many.html

  * igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@rcs0:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][106] -> [WARN][107] ([i915#4055])
   [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-skl2/igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@rcs0.html
   [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@rcs0.html

  * igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@vcs0:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][108] -> [FAIL][109] ([i915#1731]) +1 similar issue
   [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-skl2/igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@vcs0.html
   [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl2/igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@mixed@vcs0.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][110] -> [PASS][111]
   [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-skl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
   [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-skl4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts:
    - {shard-rkl}:        ([FAIL][112], [FAIL][113]) ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][114]
   [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
   [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-4/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
   [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html

  * igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-keep-submit-fence:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][115] ([i915#4525]) -> [PASS][116] +2 similar issues
   [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-keep-submit-fence.html
   [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@parallel-keep-submit-fence.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [FAIL][117] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][118]
   [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglu-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglu-4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][119] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][120] +1 similar issue
   [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
   [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][121] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][122]
   [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html
   [122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][123] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][124]
   [123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html
   [124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][125] ([i915#2849]) -> [PASS][126]
   [125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
   [126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-submit-golden-slice@bcs0:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [INCOMPLETE][127] -> [PASS][128]
   [127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglu-7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-submit-golden-slice@bcs0.html
   [128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglu-1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-submit-golden-slice@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [FAIL][129] ([i915#1888]) -> [PASS][130]
   [129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglu-2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem.html
   [130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglu-2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
    - shard-glk:          [DMESG-WARN][131] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) -> [PASS][132]
   [131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-glk5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
   [132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-glk7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][133] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][134]
   [133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-4/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp.html
   [134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-pread:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][135] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][136]
   [135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-pread.html
   [136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-pread.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gtt:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [INCOMPLETE][137] -> [PASS][138] +1 similar issue
   [137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@gtt.html
   [138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@gtt.html

  * igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-toggle-modeset-transition:
    - shard-tglb:         [INCOMPLETE][139] -> [PASS][140]
   [139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11088/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-toggle-modeset-transition.html
   [140]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-toggle-modeset-transition.html

  * igt@kms_color@pipe-c-invalid-degamma-lut-sizes:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][141] ([i915#4070]) -> [PASS][142] +1 similar issue
   [1

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22004/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 33577 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
@ 2022-01-20 18:13   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Teres Alexis, Alan Previn @ 2022-01-20 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele, intel-gfx
  Cc: Summers, Stuart, Harrison, John C, dri-devel

Just one nit below, (assuming that igt CI failure isnt related - kms flip not completing)
Reviewed-by Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:33 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; Summers, Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>; Harrison, John C <john.c.harrison@intel.com>; Teres Alexis, Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers

Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC deprivilege.
On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
 		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
+	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
+	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
+	 */
+	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
+		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;

Nit: not sure if it matters if this stepping is not-public (although I am not 100% sure I am correct in my assumption this is not-public).
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
@ 2022-01-20 18:13   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Teres Alexis, Alan Previn @ 2022-01-20 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele, intel-gfx; +Cc: dri-devel

Just one nit below, (assuming that igt CI failure isnt related - kms flip not completing)
Reviewed-by Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:33 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; Summers, Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>; Harrison, John C <john.c.harrison@intel.com>; Teres Alexis, Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers

Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC deprivilege.
On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
 		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
+	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
+	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
+	 */
+	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
+		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;

Nit: not sure if it matters if this stepping is not-public (although I am not 100% sure I am correct in my assumption this is not-public).
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
  2022-01-20 18:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
@ 2022-01-20 18:48     ` Matthew Brost
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2022-01-20 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
  Cc: Summers, Stuart, intel-gfx, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele, dri-devel,
	Harrison, John C

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 06:13:47PM +0000, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> Just one nit below, (assuming that igt CI failure isnt related - kms flip not completing)
> Reviewed-by Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> 
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:33 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; Summers, Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>; Harrison, John C <john.c.harrison@intel.com>; Teres Alexis, Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
> 
> Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC deprivilege.
> On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
> Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
>  		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
> +	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
> +	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
> +		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;
> 
> Nit: not sure if it matters if this stepping is not-public (although I am not 100% sure I am correct in my assumption this is not-public).

Agree with Alan.

Are we ever going to let A0 / A1 stepping for DG2 be publicly available?
If the answer is no, I think this can be removed.

Matt

>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
@ 2022-01-20 18:48     ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2022-01-20 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Teres Alexis, Alan Previn; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 06:13:47PM +0000, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> Just one nit below, (assuming that igt CI failure isnt related - kms flip not completing)
> Reviewed-by Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> 
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:33 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; Summers, Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>; Harrison, John C <john.c.harrison@intel.com>; Teres Alexis, Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers
> 
> Starting from DG2, some of the programming previously done by i915 and the GuC has been moved to the GSC and the relevant registers are no longer writable by either CPU or GuC. This is also referred to as GuC deprivilege.
> On the i915 side, this affects the WOPCM registers: these are no longer programmed by the driver and we do instead expect to find them already set. This can lead to verification failures because in i915 we cheat a bit with the WOPCM size defines, to keep the code common across platforms, by sometimes using a smaller WOPCM size that the actual HW support (which isn't a problem because the extra size is not needed if the FW fits in the smaller chunk), while the pre-programmed values can use the actual size.
> Given tha the new programming entity is trusted, relax the amount of the checks done on the pre-programmed values by not limiting the max programmed size. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the registers have been misprogrammed, we will still fail later at DMA time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  3 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c            |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  8 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 93b251b25aba..88aad892a0fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
>  		memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Early DG2 steppings don't have the GuC depriv feature. We can't
> +	 * rely on the fuse on those platforms because the meaning of the fuse
> +	 * bit is inverted on platforms that do have the feature.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_DG2_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, G10, STEP_A0, STEP_A1))
> +		info->has_guc_deprivilege = 0;
> 
> Nit: not sure if it matters if this stepping is not-public (although I am not 100% sure I am correct in my assumption this is not-public).

Agree with Alan.

Are we ever going to let A0 / A1 stepping for DG2 be publicly available?
If the answer is no, I think this can be removed.

Matt

>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-20 18:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-14 19:33 [PATCH] drm/i915/wopcm: Handle pre-programmed WOPCM registers Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2022-01-14 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2022-01-14 20:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-01-14 20:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-01-14 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-17 12:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-01-20 18:13 ` [PATCH] " Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-01-20 18:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-01-20 18:48   ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-20 18:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.