[PATCH] spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[PATCH] spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c
index 2888d8a8dc6d..220ee08c4a06 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-sflash.c
@@ -486,10 +486,9 @@ static int tegra_sflash_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto exit_pm_disable;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pm runtime get failed, e = %d\n", ret);
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
 		goto exit_pm_disable;
 	}
 
@@ -549,9 +548,8 @@ static int tegra_sflash_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct tegra_sflash_data *tsd = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
 		dev_err(dev, "pm runtime failed, e = %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:01:03 +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
      commit: 2b8070840e6f48b5406ebe1630a0335843109799

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark