From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF89C433F5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 18:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240436AbiEXS45 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 14:56:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50020 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239820AbiEXS4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 14:56:55 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDB350075 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 11:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88649615D9 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 18:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4F3DC34100 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 18:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] RELEASE_LOCKOWNER discussion, cont... From: Chuck Lever To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: <165341832236.3187.8388683641228729897.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net> User-Agent: StGit/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Check-point for discussion. For completeness, here is the whole series of patches (including experimental and temporary patches) that I'm considering for addressing the RELEASE_LOCKOWNER "sleep while spin locked" splat. It's not finished by any means. Getting the new boolean arguments right is not straightforward. This series does not work properly, for example, when LOCK returns NFS4ERR_DENIED -- it leaves the lo_lockcnt bumped. I still fear this approach would be brittle in the long run; I'm leaning towards the so_count-based approach instead, as that is simple and nicely contained within NFSD itself. Thanks for taking a look. --- Chuck Lever (6): fs/locks.c: Count held file locks NFSD: Fix possible sleep during nfsd4_release_lockowner() blargh NFSD: Modernize nfsd4_release_lockowner() NFSD: Add documenting comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner() NFSD: nfsd_file_put() can sleep fs/lockd/svclock.c | 4 +-- fs/locks.c | 20 +++++++----- fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 2 ++ fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- fs/nfsd/state.h | 1 + include/linux/fs.h | 12 ++----- 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) -- Chuck Lever