All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	rumen.telbizov@menlosecurity.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Clear up confusion in bpf_skb_adjust_room()'s documentation
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:36:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166057776863.2541.17985979200763729909.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220812153727.224500-3-quentin@isovalent.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:37:27 +0100 you wrote:
> Adding or removing room space _below_ layers 2 or 3, as the description
> mentions, is ambiguous. This was written with a mental image of the
> packet with layer 2 at the top, layer 3 under it, and so on. But it has
> led users to believe that it was on lower layers (before the beginning
> of the L2 and L3 headers respectively).
> 
> Let's make it more explicit, and specify between which layers the room
> space is adjusted.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: Clear up confusion in bpf_skb_adjust_room()'s documentation
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4961d0772578

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-12 15:37 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Clear up confusion in bpf_skb_adjust_room()'s documentation Quentin Monnet
2022-08-15 15:36 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=166057776863.2541.17985979200763729909.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=rumen.telbizov@menlosecurity.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.