From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02932C4167D for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230208AbiJTGoN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:44:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34550 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230171AbiJTGoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:44:07 -0400 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9D41C1170; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:44:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R201e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=8;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VSdzyK-_1666248242; Received: from j66a10360.sqa.eu95.tbsite.net(mailfrom:alibuda@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VSdzyK-_1666248242) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:44:02 +0800 From: "D.Wythe" To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net/smc: Fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link() Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:43:51 +0800 Message-Id: <1666248232-63751-10-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1666248232-63751-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1666248232-63751-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org From: "D. Wythe" After we optimize the parallel capability of SMC-R connection establish, there is a certain chance to trigger the following panic: PID: 5900 TASK: ffff88c1c8af4100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "kworker/1:48" #0 [ffff9456c1cc79a0] machine_kexec at ffffffff870665b7 #1 [ffff9456c1cc79f0] __crash_kexec at ffffffff871b4c7a #2 [ffff9456c1cc7ab0] crash_kexec at ffffffff871b5b60 #3 [ffff9456c1cc7ac0] oops_end at ffffffff87026ce7 #4 [ffff9456c1cc7ae0] page_fault_oops at ffffffff87075715 #5 [ffff9456c1cc7b58] exc_page_fault at ffffffff87ad0654 #6 [ffff9456c1cc7b80] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff87c00b62 [exception RIP: ib_alloc_mr+19] RIP: ffffffffc0c9cce3 RSP: ffff9456c1cc7c38 RFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff88c1ea281d00 R8: 000000020a34ffff R9: ffff88c1350bbb20 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000010 R14: ffff88c1ab040a50 R15: ffff88c1ea281d00 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffff9456c1cc7c60] smc_ib_get_memory_region at ffffffffc0aff6df [smc] #8 [ffff9456c1cc7c88] smcr_buf_map_link at ffffffffc0b0278c [smc] #9 [ffff9456c1cc7ce0] __smc_buf_create at ffffffffc0b03586 [smc] The reason here is that when the server tries to create a second link, smc_llc_srv_add_link() has no protection and may add a new link to link group. This breaks the security environment protected by llc_conf_mutex. Fixes: 2d2209f20189 ("net/smc: first part of add link processing as SMC server") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 3bac24e..8647d5e 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -1829,8 +1829,10 @@ static int smcr_serv_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc) smc_llc_link_active(link); smcr_lgr_set_type(link->lgr, SMC_LGR_SINGLE); + down_write(&link->lgr->llc_conf_mutex); /* initial contact - try to establish second link */ smc_llc_srv_add_link(link, NULL); + up_write(&link->lgr->llc_conf_mutex); return 0; } -- 1.8.3.1