From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B101C7113C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236497AbjAIEEe (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:04:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236499AbjAIEEJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:04:09 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo12.lge.com [156.147.23.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37012D127 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:03:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse6q.lge.com) (156.147.1.121) by 156.147.23.52 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.121 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 19/23] dept: Apply timeout consideration to swait Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:33:47 +0900 Message-Id: <1673235231-30302-20-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the consideration to swait, assuming an input 'ret' in ___swait_event() macro is used as a timeout value. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- include/linux/swait.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h index 1304209..339e5f2 100644 --- a/include/linux/swait.h +++ b/include/linux/swait.h @@ -162,7 +162,10 @@ static inline bool swq_has_sleeper(struct swait_queue_head *wq) struct swait_queue __wait; \ long __ret = ret; \ \ - sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + if (!__ret || __ret == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + else \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak_timeout(NULL); \ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list); \ for (;;) { \ long __int = prepare_to_swait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);\ -- 1.9.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702D2C5479D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0033510E256; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo12.lge.com [156.147.23.52]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ECE10E253 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse6q.lge.com) (156.147.1.121) by 156.147.23.52 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.121 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:54 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 19/23] dept: Apply timeout consideration to swait Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:33:47 +0900 Message-Id: <1673235231-30302-20-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, peterz@infradead.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, amir73il@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, cl@linux.com, will@kernel.org, duyuyang@gmail.com, sashal@kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, willy@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, djwong@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, dennis@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ngupta@vflare.org, johannes.berg@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, vbabka@suse.cz, melissa.srw@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jlayton@kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the consideration to swait, assuming an input 'ret' in ___swait_event() macro is used as a timeout value. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- include/linux/swait.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h index 1304209..339e5f2 100644 --- a/include/linux/swait.h +++ b/include/linux/swait.h @@ -162,7 +162,10 @@ static inline bool swq_has_sleeper(struct swait_queue_head *wq) struct swait_queue __wait; \ long __ret = ret; \ \ - sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + if (!__ret || __ret == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak(NULL); \ + else \ + sdt_might_sleep_weak_timeout(NULL); \ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list); \ for (;;) { \ long __int = prepare_to_swait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);\ -- 1.9.1