From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270263AbTGSPBT (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:01:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270468AbTGSPBT (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:01:19 -0400 Received: from lrsehosting.com ([198.78.66.31]:16146 "EHLO www.geekizoid.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270436AbTGSPBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:01:18 -0400 From: Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-ID: <16904.68.170.240.58.1058627770.squirrel@www.lrsehosting.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD To: In-Reply-To: <200307191503.h6JF3tac002376@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <200307191503.h6JF3tac002376@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: , , , , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >> If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating >> up Larry they'd get a lot further. >> > Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and >> although BK seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux >> developers, that doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of >> other free OS >> > development teams. >> > I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few >> more years of HURD development, for example. >> > Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my >> bug database, have we? :-). >> > John. >> >> Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as >> Linux/HURD. > > What HURD code comes from Linux? GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but not > HURD as far as I know. > Hi John! Go take a look at their networking, and IDE code. ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/