From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 19:30:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1695c88d-e5ad-1854-cdef-3cd95c812574@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adefac87-c2b3-b67f-fb4d-d763ce920bef@citrix.com>
On 9/8/19 5:11 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 08/09/2019 19:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/6/19 7:00 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2019 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> Where is MCFG parsed? pci_arch_init()?
>>>>> It happens twice:
>>> 1) first time early one in pci_arch_init() that is arch_initcall - that
>>> time pci_mmcfg_list will be freed immediately there because MCFG area is
>>> not reserved in E820;
>>> 2) second time late one in acpi_init() which is subsystem_initcall right
>>> before where PCI enumeration starts - this time ACPI tables will be
>>> checked for a reserved resource and pci_mmcfg_list will be finally
>>> populated.
>>>
>>> The problem is that on a system that doesn't have MCFG area reserved in
>>> E820 pci_mmcfg_list is empty before acpi_init() and our PCI hooks are
>>> called in the same place. So MCFG is still not in use by Xen at this
>>> point since we haven't reached our xen_mcfg_late().
>>
>> Would it be possible for us to parse MCFG ourselves in pci_xen_init()? I
>> realize that we'd be doing this twice (or maybe even three times since
>> apparently both pci_arch_init() and acpi_ini() do it).
>>
> I don't thine it makes sense:
> a) it needs to be done after ACPI is initialized since we need to parse
> it to figure out the exact reserved region - that's why it's currently
> done in acpi_init() (see commit message for the reasons why)
Hmm... We should be able to parse ACPI tables by the time
pci_arch_init() is called. In fact, if you look at
pci_mmcfg_early_init() you will see that it does just that.
> b) given (a) we cannot do it ourselves before acpi_init and after is too
> late as we're already past ACPI PCI enumeration
> c) we'd have to do it in the same place I call xen_mcfg_late() and it'd
> be code duplication of what's already done by the existing code.
If we manage to parse MCFG ourselves early then maybe we won't not need
xen_mcfg_late()? We can call PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved right away.
-boris
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 19:30:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1695c88d-e5ad-1854-cdef-3cd95c812574@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adefac87-c2b3-b67f-fb4d-d763ce920bef@citrix.com>
On 9/8/19 5:11 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 08/09/2019 19:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/6/19 7:00 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2019 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> Where is MCFG parsed? pci_arch_init()?
>>>>> It happens twice:
>>> 1) first time early one in pci_arch_init() that is arch_initcall - that
>>> time pci_mmcfg_list will be freed immediately there because MCFG area is
>>> not reserved in E820;
>>> 2) second time late one in acpi_init() which is subsystem_initcall right
>>> before where PCI enumeration starts - this time ACPI tables will be
>>> checked for a reserved resource and pci_mmcfg_list will be finally
>>> populated.
>>>
>>> The problem is that on a system that doesn't have MCFG area reserved in
>>> E820 pci_mmcfg_list is empty before acpi_init() and our PCI hooks are
>>> called in the same place. So MCFG is still not in use by Xen at this
>>> point since we haven't reached our xen_mcfg_late().
>>
>> Would it be possible for us to parse MCFG ourselves in pci_xen_init()? I
>> realize that we'd be doing this twice (or maybe even three times since
>> apparently both pci_arch_init() and acpi_ini() do it).
>>
> I don't thine it makes sense:
> a) it needs to be done after ACPI is initialized since we need to parse
> it to figure out the exact reserved region - that's why it's currently
> done in acpi_init() (see commit message for the reasons why)
Hmm... We should be able to parse ACPI tables by the time
pci_arch_init() is called. In fact, if you look at
pci_mmcfg_early_init() you will see that it does just that.
> b) given (a) we cannot do it ourselves before acpi_init and after is too
> late as we're already past ACPI PCI enumeration
> c) we'd have to do it in the same place I call xen_mcfg_late() and it'd
> be code duplication of what's already done by the existing code.
If we manage to parse MCFG ourselves early then maybe we won't not need
xen_mcfg_late()? We can call PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved right away.
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-08 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 0:20 [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 0:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-04 9:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-09-04 11:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 11:36 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 12:09 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-04 12:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-09-06 22:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-06 22:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-06 23:00 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-06 23:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 18:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 18:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 21:11 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 21:11 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 23:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2019-09-08 23:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 23:37 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 23:37 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-09 19:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-09 19:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-09 21:48 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-09 21:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 1:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 1:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 9:46 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 9:46 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-10 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-10 10:08 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 10:08 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 17:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 17:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 20:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 20:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 21:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 21:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-11 1:15 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-11 1:15 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-11 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-11 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12 17:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-12 17:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1695c88d-e5ad-1854-cdef-3cd95c812574@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.