From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] e1000: move pci device ids to driver Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:56:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13> References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <2858831.tSF8KXeB50@xps13> <20160711053326.GW26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand , stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, pmatilai@redhat.com, christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, Wenzhuo Lu , ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Rasesh Mody , johndale@cisco.om, Yong Wang To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5272B8E for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f65so50183690wmi.0 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:56:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160711053326.GW26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-04-20 14:43, David Marchand: > > > test application and kni still want to know e1000 pci devices. > > > So let's create headers in the driver that will be used by them. > > > > There is also an usage of ixgbe ID for the broken bypass API. > > > > Sharing those PCI ids outside of the drivers was really a wrong idea. > > So this a plan to get rid of them: > > > > 1/ remove need in PCI autotest (done: http://dpdk.org/commit/1dbba165) > > 2/ move PCI ids in bnx2x, bnxt, e1000, enic, fm10k, i40e, virtio, vmxnet3 > > 3/ remove KNI ethtool (only igb/ixgbe support) > > 4/ remove bypass API or move it to ixgbe specific API > > 5/ move remaining PCI ids in igb and ixgbe drivers > > > > Please driver maintainers, move your PCI ids in your drivers as soon as > > possible. Thanks > > Hi Thomas, > > I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend > what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part? > > If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail > apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on > the same base while touching some same files. Good point. There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt). That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change. But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset. David, ok to refresh these patches?