From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Li, Shaohua" Subject: RE: Re: Samsung P35 and S3 suspend Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:43:53 +0800 Message-ID: <16A54BF5D6E14E4D916CE26C9AD30575D82398@pdsmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Stefan D?singer , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Johan Vromans , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org >The background is that any write access to the pci config registers of some >devices(sound card, usb 2.0 controler, and modem) cause a system lockup if >they are called before acpi_leave_sleep_state and >acpi_disable_wakeup_device >were called. This is on an Acer Travelmate 803 Notebook, and it seems to be >the same on other systems. > >I sent the patch to the list, but it seems that nobody noticed it and I >forgot >to send it again. Here is an updated patch against 2.6.10. I can't promise >that it doesn't break other systems. Someone should make sure that >pm_ops->leave is set to NULL for apm. I haven't found this in the apm code >yet. This patch is quite interesting. If you just move ' acpi_leave_sleep_state(acpi_state)' to acpi_pm_leave, what's the result? And please send me a copy of your acpidmp, I'd like look at it. Thanks, Shaohua ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/