From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751573AbdJVNZS (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 09:25:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:46678 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751215AbdJVNZQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 09:25:16 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] genwqe: Take R/W permissions into account when dealing with memory pages To: Greg KH Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20171020192749.20194-1-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171021075146.GA21399@kroah.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 11:25:07 -0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171021075146.GA21399@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17102213-0008-0000-0000-000002941CE1 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007935; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000239; SDB=6.00934827; UDB=6.00470922; IPR=6.00715093; BA=6.00005656; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00017658; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-10-22 13:25:13 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17102213-0009-0000-0000-00003715A741 Message-Id: <16d85189-6d3c-dddc-5132-e34d19ee4f73@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-10-22_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710220194 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2017 05:51 AM, Greg KH wrote: > Is this a regression? It seems like it's just a "fix something that has > always been broken but no one has noticed yet" type of thing, right? > Yes, this a fix for something that always has been broken, not a regression! Thanks, Guilherme > thanks, > > greg k-h >