From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Walter Lozano Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:06:13 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] doc: rockchip: Update documentation with Rock Pi 4 In-Reply-To: <20200519210254.GM14425@bill-the-cat> References: <20200519184509.21729-1-walter.lozano@collabora.com> <20200519210254.GM14425@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <16f4e95d-6ae8-5afe-1059-c78cc16d5c49@collabora.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tom, On 19/5/20 18:02, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:29:31PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote: >> Hi Jagan >> >> On 19/5/20 15:57, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:15 AM Walter Lozano >>> wrote: >>>> Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano >>>> --- >>>> doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> We have doc/board/rockchip please update there. >> Documentation in doc/board/rockchip already states the support for Radxa >> Rock Pi 4. Unfortunately having two different documentation which overlaps >> tends to be redundancy prone. >> >> >> At this point I think that the best approach it to spawn two tasks >> >> 1- Update the doc/README.rockchip with any specific information which needs >> to be updated >> >> 2- Continue to move doc/README.rockchip to doc/board/rockchip as you started >> to do >> >> >> I might find some time to work in task 2, but in the meantime I think this >> patch goes in the direction of task 1 >> >> >> Do you agree? > I'd like to see doc/README.rockchip go away in favour of > doc/board/rockchip/ as soon as possible, especially since this is an > area with active development. I'd rather see an update to > doc/README.rockchip saying that doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst has the > list of supported hardware as the step forward here. Thanks! > OK, it makes sense. I'll prepare such patch and send it. Regards, Walter