From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751240AbdGOXpw (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jul 2017 19:45:52 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61253 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbdGOXpv (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jul 2017 19:45:51 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mason Cc: Florian Fainelli , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ulf Hansson , Daniel Lezcano , linux-pm , Thibaud Cornic , JB , Kevin Hilman , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] PM / suspend: Add platform_suspend_target_state() Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:38:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1703157.S2GHVxrQk4@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.12.0-rc1+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr> References: <20170622085102.mpk7vxodpgxtrlfd@piout.net> <1578637.1XJQpJurXn@aspire.rjw.lan> <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, July 16, 2017 01:34:53 AM Mason wrote: > On 16/07/2017 01:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:20:27 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > >> The enum offers the advantage of centralizing how many different states > >> exist for all the platforms we know about in the kernel, it's easy to > >> define common values for platforms that have the same semantics, just > >> like it's simple to add new values for platform specific details. > > > > Well, you seem to be liking this, so why don't you just implement it? > > At the end of his message, Florian wrote: > > > In any case, just agree and I will be happy to follow-up with patches. But it may be hard to convince everybody without posting code changes and often enough showing a patch makes a good argument. Thanks, Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:38:04 +0200 Subject: [RFC 1/2] PM / suspend: Add platform_suspend_target_state() In-Reply-To: <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr> References: <20170622085102.mpk7vxodpgxtrlfd@piout.net> <1578637.1XJQpJurXn@aspire.rjw.lan> <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr> Message-ID: <1703157.S2GHVxrQk4@aspire.rjw.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sunday, July 16, 2017 01:34:53 AM Mason wrote: > On 16/07/2017 01:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:20:27 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > >> The enum offers the advantage of centralizing how many different states > >> exist for all the platforms we know about in the kernel, it's easy to > >> define common values for platforms that have the same semantics, just > >> like it's simple to add new values for platform specific details. > > > > Well, you seem to be liking this, so why don't you just implement it? > > At the end of his message, Florian wrote: > > > In any case, just agree and I will be happy to follow-up with patches. But it may be hard to convince everybody without posting code changes and often enough showing a patch makes a good argument. Thanks, Rafael