From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Hartmann Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio - bisected Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:13:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1705a3cc-4d9f-8fd0-3eed-9f6a145d5055@01019freenet.de> References: <4efbaf24-f419-2c8e-c705-59a5242b0575@01019freenet.de> <881560f8-54ec-e946-50cb-b2e80ddb5f97@01019freenet.de> <73b7a7b0-4264-2bd0-9e65-69841377f09f@redhat.com> <401a0715-fd28-63a3-8dfd-e89835d70db0@01019freenet.de> <11c25b88-af9b-a1f7-b5f5-0420c75916d7@01019freenet.de> <20171208084751.tom4auppogz4lanz@unicorn.suse.cz> <20171208114025.kjcaratqcveq7zu5@unicorn.suse.cz> <7bd2baab-56a7-95d1-e63b-74dc92da936b@01019freenet.de> <20171208125835.xnjzidixymdqovmy@unicorn.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Wang , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Kubecek Return-path: Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:50901 "EHLO mx1.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753437AbdLHNNo (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:13:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171208125835.xnjzidixymdqovmy@unicorn.suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/08/2017 at 01:58 PM Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:45:38PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> On 12/08/2017 at 12:40 PM Michal Kubecek wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>>> >>>> When will there be a fix for 4.14? It is clearly a regression. Is >>>> it possible / a good idea to just remove the complete patch series >>>> "Remove UDP Fragmentation Offload support"? >>> >>> I cannot give an exact date but the patch is queued for stable (see >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* ) so that >>> it should land in stable-4.14 in near future (weeks at most). >> >> Which one is it? I couldn't find any patch related to this problem at >> first glance. > > "[net,v2] net: accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet" - the > subject was mentioned in one of my earlier e-mails (with commit id). Oh - I thought this would only work during live migration (which doesn't happen here). My error. Thanks, regards, Andreas