From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4A6ECDFDF for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827C720835 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="guq/5jXY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 827C720835 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727188AbeJJBqx (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:46:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.215]:45122 "EHLO mx2.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726523AbeJJBqu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:46:50 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF0D405F6; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:28:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date:subject:subject :from:from:received; s=mail20150812; t=1539109712; bh=5nqLz1UDgm fJxGryT86h8lM4B8ngIvDnxkckVijhEuI=; b=guq/5jXYsP99hkkSAc3D1vj4eH D9udeu56tcImDLOWKr74Vdwa0cY3YTwAVthPFf2AdDL0XQyXamhhgOmR0l3OZQL5 h8mi0drbCR+oWKN7r9T8AQAXOI4v0gMHHbljeb4niAmb5+TJYQbZ2KCFSQpwLwvV T+QQUpj0kpvF1jy4wAqbWuzPqwZipNzfFIjFLkExas9UOzH92k8l9/g2EmzDqAhw AYx9IcLivB/2fJ/MOZW+BlWzvlKCfbRqJrKjcuey/oRh6al2hBgY/U0ZX/2cWWGA 3fqJPzCD+nJve9VFtvvCgoSWB6I9Ty+1S+bOBnFn+gviPcnnm7OSmgqu88CA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.117]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id uqIpUB_H9GV2; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:28:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Rainer Fiebig To: Josh Triplett Cc: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:29:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1718828.OxLgMoHbrt@siriux> In-Reply-To: <20181008152043.GA5796@localhost> References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20181008152043.GA5796@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2018, 08:20:44 schrieb Josh Triplett: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:36:39PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch > > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by > > the project to correct this ambiguity. > > Upstream has now adopted a FAQ, which addresses this and many other > questions. See https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq . > > Might I suggest adding that link to the bottom of the document, instead? > (And then, optionally, submitting entries for that FAQ.) > The Code of Conflict has 28 lines, including the heading. The Code of Conduct has 81 lines, including the heading. And it needs a FAQ. Hm. Here's a one-line Code of Conduct from Kant: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law."[1] Put another way: Don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you. Simple beats complex. No FAQ necessary, imo. Regards! Rainer Fiebig [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant -- The truth always turns out to be simpler than you thought. Richard Feynman