From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?0JDQu9C10LrRgdC10Lkg0JHQvtC70LTRi9GA0LXQsg==?= Subject: Re: Bug and configuration MPLS error? Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:40:32 +0300 Message-ID: <1728581493210432@web45j.yandex.ru> References: <184081493141314@web16g.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: David Ahern , netdev Return-path: Received: from forward4o.cmail.yandex.net ([37.9.109.248]:37937 "EHLO forward4o.cmail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993770AbdDZMu2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:50:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 26.04.2017, 05:23, "David Ahern" : > On 4/25/17 11:28 AM, Алексей Болдырев wrote: >>  226 sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.lo.input=1 >>  227 sysctl -w net.mpls.platform_labels=1048575 >>  228 ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 >>  229 ip link add veth2 type veth peer name veth3 >>  230 sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.veth0.input=1 >>  231 sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.veth2.input=1 >>  232 ifconfig veth0 10.3.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >>  233 ifconfig veth2 10.4.4.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >>  234 ip netns add host1 >>  235 ip netns add host2 >>  236 ip link set veth1 netns host1 >>  237 ip link set veth3 netns host2 >>  238 ip netns exec host1 ifconfig veth1 10.3.3.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >>  239 ip netns exec host2 ifconfig veth3 10.4.4.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >>  240 ip netns exec host1 ip route add 10.10.10.2/32 encap mpls 112 via inet 10.3.3.1 >>  241 ip netns exec host2 ip route add 10.10.10.1/32 encap mpls 111 via inet 10.4.4.1 >>  242 ip -f mpls route add 111 via inet 10.3.3.2 >>  243 ip -f mpls route add 112 via inet 10.4.4.2 > > your setup is incomplete. > > # ip netns exec host2 ping 10.10.10.1 > PING 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > ^C > --- 10.10.10.1 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1038ms > > If you run tcpdump on veth1 in host1 you see the packets come in but no > response: > > # ip netns exec host1 tcpdump -n -i veth1 > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > listening on veth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes > 19:20:24.599529 IP6 fe80::347d:e3ff:fe93:944b > ff02::2: ICMP6, router > solicitation, length 16 > 19:20:27.413901 IP 10.4.4.2 > 10.10.10.1: ICMP echo request, id 978, seq > 1, length 64 > 19:20:28.439574 IP 10.4.4.2 > 10.10.10.1: ICMP echo request, id 978, seq > 2, length 64 > > and the lack of response is b/c: > 1. host1 has no address for 10.10.10.1 and > 2. even if it did, there is no return route to 10.4.4.2: > > # ip -netns host1 ro ls > 10.3.3.0/24 dev veth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.3.3.2 > 10.10.10.2 encap mpls 112 via 10.3.3.1 dev veth1 As for ping, you need to enter this: Ip netns exec host2 ping 10.10.10.1 -A 10.10.10.2 Here I published the results of testing on new (>4.9) cores. (in Russian): http://forum.nag.ru/forum/index.php?s=d09f0e5186fda59b3099eb81ad07ee63&showtopic=128927 But on the old kernels: http://forum.nag.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=128927&view=findpost&p=1396067