From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v6 0/9] enable lpm, acl and other missing libraries in ppc64le Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:29:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1743150.qJCZaSafhS@xps13> References: <1471343279-24014-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <001f01d1f864$46b65eb0$d4231c10$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <001701d1ff88$5b468b40$11d3a1c0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Bruce Richardson To: Chao Zhu , gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4245A9D for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id q128so283970499wma.1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <001701d1ff88$5b468b40$11d3a1c0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-08-26 18:55, Chao Zhu: > Thomas, > > Any comments of this patch set? Are we waiting for more acks? Yes, especially for lpm and acl, a review from respective maintainers may be needed. Konstantin? Bruce? If no review is done in 1 week, it will be applied as-is. Gowrishankar, using --in-reply when sending would help to check the history of the patchset. Please remind for next time.