From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrSZ-0008UC-2m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:41:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrSN-00024B-1q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:41:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrSM-00023p-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:40:50 -0400 From: Paul Moore Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:40:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1751669.pVXhXCSxuK@sifl> In-Reply-To: <20121029153234.GA5831@redhat.com> References: <508E9C93.8000209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121029153234.GA5831@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libseccomp-discuss] [RFC] [PATCHv2 0/2] Sandboxing Qemu guests with Libseccomp List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Corey Bryant Cc: libseccomp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, Kees Cook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday, October 29, 2012 03:32:34 PM Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:11:15AM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Do you know when Fedora packages will be available for libseccomp? > > They're already reviewed and in Fedora 18 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830992 What Daniel said. If you're asking about F17, I don't plan on adding libseccomp to releases prior to F18. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat