From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932077AbWGXHxx (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:53:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932078AbWGXHxx (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:53:53 -0400 Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([206.168.112.78]:37558 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932077AbWGXHxw (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:53:52 -0400 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17604.31639.213450.987415@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:49:43 +0400 To: Rene Rebe Cc: Hans Reiser , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: <200607230920.04129.rene@exactcode.de> References: <44C12F0A.1010008@namesys.com> <20060722130219.GB7321@thunk.org> <200607230920.04129.rene@exactcode.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (patch 17) "chayote" (+CVS-20040321) XEmacs Lucid X-SystemSpamProbe: GOOD 0.0000020 cdb8def4db8712d43d056eb120d37694 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rene Rebe writes: > Hi, > > On Saturday 22 July 2006 15:02, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > The code isn't even written, benchmarked, or tested yet, > > > > Actually, the first bits that we plan to merge have already been > > written and in use by hundreds of clusterfs customers, posted to LKML > > for comments (and we don't attack our reviewers, we thank them for > > their comments), and in fact they were written about at last year's > > OLS complete with benchmarks and graphs. > > (http://ext2.sourceforge.net/2005-ols/2005-ols-ext3.html) > > However I would estimate that Reiser4 is used by more people than yet > aother ext2 patchups. Any data backing up that estimation? Just to give an example, that "patchup" is used by (tens of) thousands of computers in governmental laboratories the US "national security" depends upon. > > Yours, Nikita.