From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:56:54 -0800 Message-ID: <1771721f-40fd-0042-b603-5ed763c54378@gmail.com> References: <91b43bec-cb19-b94b-8ee3-26979e3a19d1@gmail.com> <20181108012927epcms1p47f719c1908da64a378690362901644ee@epcms1p4> <20181108020523epcms1p55a0c28d3e881a079231fe813258602f6@epcms1p5> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: soukjin.bae@samsung.com, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:39274 "EHLO mail-pl1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728499AbeKHNaY (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:30:24 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id b5-v6so8885342pla.6 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:56:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/07/2018 07:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Sure, it is better if RPS is smarter, but if there is a bug in IPv6 defrag unit > we must investigate and root-cause it. BTW, IPv4 defrag seems to have the same issue.