From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 06/13] eal/linux: standalone intr event fd create support Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:39:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1790585.Z8rAdeIt1H@xps13> References: <1434686442-578-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <1437113775-32199-7-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <1831628.YzNoj6xjSe@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, shemming@brocade.com To: Cunming Liang Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483A7C332 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:40:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wgbcc4 with SMTP id cc4so25479539wgb.3 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:40:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1831628.YzNoj6xjSe@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-07-20 01:35, Thomas Monjalon: > 2015-07-17 14:16, Cunming Liang: > > +#ifdef RTE_NEXT_ABI > > +extern int > > +rte_intr_efd_enable(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle, uint32_t nb_efd); > > +#else > > +static inline int > > +rte_intr_efd_enable(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle, uint32_t nb_efd) > > +{ > > + RTE_SET_USED(intr_handle); > > + RTE_SET_USED(nb_efd); > > + return 0; > > +} > > +#endif > [...] > > +#ifdef RTE_NEXT_ABI > > +extern void > > +rte_intr_efd_disable(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle); > > +#else > > +static inline void > > +rte_intr_efd_disable(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) > > +{ > > + RTE_SET_USED(intr_handle); > > +} > > +#endif > [...] > > +#ifdef RTE_NEXT_ABI > > +static inline int > > +rte_intr_dp_is_en(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) > > +{ > > + return !(!intr_handle->nb_efd); > > +} > > +#else > > +static inline int > > +rte_intr_dp_is_en(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) > > +{ > > + RTE_SET_USED(intr_handle); > > + return 0; > > +} > > +#endif > [...] > > +#ifdef RTE_NEXT_ABI > > +static inline int > > +rte_intr_allow_others(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) > > +{ > > + return !!(intr_handle->max_intr - intr_handle->nb_efd); > > +} > > +#else > > +static inline int > > +rte_intr_allow_others(struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) > > +{ > > + RTE_SET_USED(intr_handle); > > + return 1; > > +} > > +#endif > > Why these #else cases? Why not totally removing these ifdef in the header and use them in .c? > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > @@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ DPDK_2.1 { > > > > rte_epoll_ctl; > > rte_epoll_wait; > > + rte_intr_allow_others; > > + rte_intr_dp_is_en; > > + rte_intr_efd_enable; > > + rte_intr_efd_disable; > > If RTE_NEXT_ABI is disabled, these symbols do not exist. > An alternate .map would be needed.