From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 19860E0076B; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0179E00757 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2015 09:39:40 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,589,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="455358459" Received: from mmettala-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.7.57]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2015 09:24:42 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Bipnesh, Abhinav (Abhinav)" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: <1793194.PUJNIAFybC@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.5-101.fc20.x86_64; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Graceful continue if some recipe has error X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:39:43 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Abhinav, On Monday 16 February 2015 17:05:32 Bipnesh, Abhinav wrote: > We have written recipe for our application which reads some environment > variables and follow a path. But if these variables are not set then recipe > parsing results into error. So I was looking if we can have some way for a > graceful continuation. As we want if those variables are set then it > bitbake should continue with rest of building. So is there way we can > achieve the same. Depends, how are you reading the variables? From python or shell? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre