From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC37E0132F for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgbfg15 with SMTP id fg15so1155419wgb.11 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:19:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=QADF/JMHZCkAG0uuiLHXfiDBusYB3BDB8HGioYL3sLs=; b=VQ0Gu+LO0FVcKecaerhawENVkhF5dwkMzOvEFlHrz+KDRP8Im9HiN/C1klq5Bmru4g Iyc07bf47eBp5vV3HRINAtqqQanQR1urqIwcCENbWfHDzgMnLBYaOgV8q1OeBD//A33B wyxdUaIw/qBxRYJOMzeGStSC1rWw/eX0oZMqnGPuheIbqowxlILor2bg8Pr+0Vo8VLvv IANrmv0fki3YjBUdjDPHmaX6n9bWtveuqQRYOrczFtld5Yzep5GTPf8DKhUnN1A6Fft1 Fz1F+Iam/BJxjPA+bsCOjbU4txUZ0SzCBUPbQ7Ym18eBO1ZRoaDWLFXEVsdlfJtUkA5J ksyA== Received: by 10.181.12.82 with SMTP id eo18mr38264079wid.2.1335334775970; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.1.36] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm35095703wib.2.2012.04.24.23.19.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <4F9794F0.20706@dresearch-fe.de> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:19:32 +0200 Message-Id: <17B574FF-1E81-4D65-8C70-439CCC24974D@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <4F910E4F.9000800@dresearch-fe.de> <20120420132050.GA3783@denix.org> <4F9168F4.50306@dresearch-fe.de> <4F9794F0.20706@dresearch-fe.de> To: Steffen Sledz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7EUaa1yDwvd7/TG8vs8GcEwB8+nmZs85+wdHQJVCHBKpPl78vXsujSOEN1YkUq9FvMbGk Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: meta-ti layer confusion X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:19:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 25 apr. 2012, om 08:08 heeft Steffen Sledz het volgende geschreven: > On 20.04.2012 15:47, Steffen Sledz wrote: >> On 20.04.2012 15:20, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>>> Our company is working on a new TI DM814x based hardware currently. >>>>=20 >>>> That's a really hard job, because the TI linux support is not = really "optimal". But that's not the primary cause for my message. >>>>=20 >>>> [1] lists two TI BSP layers [2],[3] each one claiming to be "The = official OpenEmbedded/Yocto BSP layer for Texas Instruments platforms.". >>>>=20 >>>> A look into them shows that they are not identically. At the moment = they differ in two commits ([3] is ahead of [2]). In the last days these = differences where much bigger. >>>>=20 >>>> So what is the intention for these two "offical" layers? >>>>=20 >>>> Which one should we use? And why? >>>>=20 >>>> BTW: Is anyone else out there working on a TI DM814x/DM816x = hardware? >>>>=20 >>>> Regards, >>>> Steffen >>>>=20 >>>> [1] >>>> [2] >>>> [3] >>>=20 >>> They are the same. Or more appropriately, there is just one official = meta-ti=20 >>> layer, it's just mirrored in several places. The one on = yoctoproject.org[2] is=20 >>> considered the official mirror and that's what you should use. If = you are=20 >>> subscribed to this list, you should have seen Koen posting 2 patches = for=20 >>> review yesterday, which he has staged to his working copy on = github[3] -=20 >>> that's the difference in 2 commits. They shouldn't have been pushed = to the=20 >>> master branch though, until they are accepted... >>=20 >> Why are they both listed in [1]? >=20 > Any objections if i remove [3] from the LayerIndex? Yes >=20 > After your comments i think that this one is just a kind of a staging = area. And you're thinking wrong=