From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1B2C433E0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC01207E8 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726667AbgGCBfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:35:05 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:7360 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbgGCBfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:35:05 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E61548CA0A9A23D04919; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:35:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:35:01 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid readahead race condition To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: Nathan Chancellor , , , References: <20200624012148.180050-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20200629150323.GA3293033@google.com> <20200629202720.GA230664@google.com> <20200630204348.GA2504307@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86> <20200630205635.GB1396584@google.com> <285a4e16-2cbc-d1e9-8464-8a06bacbaaa0@huawei.com> <20200701161442.GB1724572@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <181332c0-f60f-6438-6c79-e3a67f58c4ba@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:34:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200701161442.GB1724572@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/7/2 0:14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > How about v4? It looks good to me. Thanks, From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD1EC433E0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1FD2070C; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="AdgWiz7e"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="m6/2+Rug" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB1FD2070C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrAbo-0007Tu-AB; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:35:20 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrAbm-0007Td-Ll for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:35:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LpUvlu3MnnqsObm6sWnHGA/zfqwXLPyfheyb5aXuZxY=; b=AdgWiz7eUHKSWpTnqr1qERvI+N 8x2IxDJkbxreceCm9q/YW/tNu7m6uwooYMGO0ZHOa0Ff5hEhJIhde1Su2kr0gSIhrgoVrdB6Sg0c4 NlJQT8kyieyX9uSKLBMAmTDniVL+eKy/HodOYPbfsVZjQcBPcm3CiDFdzVWguO+/jZKw=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LpUvlu3MnnqsObm6sWnHGA/zfqwXLPyfheyb5aXuZxY=; b=m6/2+RugTPKaIVIJvor13EwGbG CsmQsLPED+vkc/B5nxYLA/2MQa1qbczRvQLjfj/5nTrwYPXHoziCCPOtxt3o8uUbrCoxJLX3SEaXl N7msivvmtuoylSb7+iBtWgO0W8Uxuvpn34wm56YOBDAceDup5nLS8FXMZQPbcQepP5iI=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jrAbk-00BRu9-8U for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 01:35:18 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E61548CA0A9A23D04919; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:35:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:35:01 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20200624012148.180050-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20200629150323.GA3293033@google.com> <20200629202720.GA230664@google.com> <20200630204348.GA2504307@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86> <20200630205635.GB1396584@google.com> <285a4e16-2cbc-d1e9-8464-8a06bacbaaa0@huawei.com> <20200701161442.GB1724572@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <181332c0-f60f-6438-6c79-e3a67f58c4ba@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:34:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200701161442.GB1724572@google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jrAbk-00BRu9-8U Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid readahead race condition X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nathan Chancellor , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/7/2 0:14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > How about v4? It looks good to me. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel