From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:47925 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755868AbcIKOgr (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 10:36:47 -0400 From: Martin Steigerwald To: Waxhead Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is stability a joke? Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:36:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1819876.6i0n7pb72V@merkaba> In-Reply-To: <57D54E7B.5040202@online.no> References: <57D51BF9.2010907@online.no> <15194548.valIGHoaRh@merkaba> <57D54E7B.5040202@online.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Sonntag, 11. September 2016, 14:30:51 CEST schrieb Waxhead: > > I think what would be a good next step would be to ask developers / users > > about feature stability and then update the wiki. If thats important to > > you, I suggest you invest some energy in doing that. And ask for help. > > This mailinglist is a good idea. > > > > I already gave you my idea on what works for me. > > > > There is just one thing I wonīt go further even a single step: The > > complaining path. As it leads to no desirable outcome. > > > > Thanks, > > My intention was not to be hostile and if my response sound a bit harsh > for you then by all means I do apologize for that. Okay, maybe I read something into your mail that you didnīt intend to put there. Sorry. Let us focus on the constructive way to move forward with this. Thanks, -- Martin