On Sunday, 1 May 2022 09:54:26 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >  	printf("\n");
> >  	printf("server mode options:\n");
> >  	printf("  -i, --interface                     specify the interface 
(or
> >  	comma separated list of interfaces) to listen on\n");> 
> > @@ -164,6 +165,7 @@ static struct globals *alfred_init(int argc, char
> > *argv[])> 
> >  		{"change-interface",	required_argument,	NULL,	
'I'},
> >  		{"change-bat-iface",	required_argument,	NULL,	
'B'},
> >  		{"server-status",	required_argument,	NULL,	'S'},
> > 
> > +		{"event-monitor",	required_argument,	NULL,	'E'},
> 
> Why does it require an argument but the usage doesn't describe the argument?

Copy & paste error from server-status which does not require an argument 
either. Might need to fix in a separate patch.


> I am wondering now if it could be interesting for the listener whether the
> data is from us or some remote (for example via the source mac). Does anyone
> else have an opinion about that?

Currently, no use-case comes to my mind.


> > +static void unix_sock_event_listener_free(struct event_listener
> > *listener)
> > +{
> > +	list_del_init(&listener->list);
> > +	close(listener->fd);
> > +	free(listener);
> 
> list_del_init has no benefit (only downsides) when you free the memory
> anyway at the end of the function

What are those downsides you are referring to ?

Thanks for the review!

Kind regards,
Marek Lindner