Hi,

I am running 4.9.7 and noticed the slab was being scanned very aggressively (200K objects scanned for 1K LRU pages).  Turning on tracing in do_shrink_slab() revealed it was sometimes being called with a LRU size of zero causing the LRU scan ratio to be very large.  The attached patch skips shrinking the slab when the LRU size is zero.  After applying the patch the slab size I no longer see the extremely large object scan values.


Trace output when LRU size is 0:


kswapd0-93    [005] .... 49736.760169: mm_shrink_slab_start: scan_shadow_nodes+0x0/0x50 ffffffff94e6e460: nid: 0 objects to shrink 59291940 gfp_flags GFP_KERNEL pgs_scanned 32 lru_pgs 0 cache items 20 delta 1280 total_scan 40
kswapd0-93    [005] .... 49736.760207: mm_shrink_slab_start: super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9d79ce488cc0: nid: 0 objects to shrink 22740669 gfp_flags GFP_KERNEL pgs_scanned 32 lru_pgs 0 cache items 1 delta 64 total_scan 2
kswapd0-93    [005] .... 49736.760216: mm_shrink_slab_start: super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9d79db59ecc0: nid: 0 objects to shrink 79098834 gfp_flags GFP_KERNEL pgs_scanned 32 lru_pgs 0 cache items 642 delta 41088 total_scan 1284
kswapd0-93    [005] .... 49736.760769: mm_shrink_slab_start: super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9d79ce488cc0: nid: 0 objects to shrink 22740729 gfp_flags GFP_KERNEL pgs_scanned 32 lru_pgs 0 cache items 1 delta 64 total_scan 2
kswapd0-93    [005] .... 49736.766125: mm_shrink_slab_start: scan_shadow_nodes+0x0/0x50 ffffffff94e6e460: nid: 0 objects to shrink 59293180 gfp_flags GFP_KERNEL pgs_scanned 32 lru_pgs 0 cache items 32 delta 2048 total_scan 64

Thanks,
Shantanu