From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QS15x-0004cp-IV for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:09:25 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 23:06:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,307,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="8265822" Received: from pgsmsx602.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.43.81]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 23:06:12 -0700 Received: from pgsmsx509.gar.corp.intel.com (172.30.13.17) by pgsmsx602.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.43.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:04:59 +0800 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.104) by PGSMSX509.gar.corp.intel.com (172.30.13.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:04:59 +0800 Received: from shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.96]) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.104]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:04:57 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:04:57 +0800 Thread-Topic: [OE-core] [RFC v1 PATCH 01/16] native.bbclass: allow a native package to be populated into its own dir Thread-Index: AcwgYosnsw/zVwtFRHqyjNjICtOOawAiBOrQ Message-ID: <1865303E0DED764181A9D882DEF65FB697F1A027A0@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <806387a97c6c01bb724c29f51de511ed43688bb0.1306931848.git.dexuan.cui@intel.com> <1306935653.2529.88.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1306935653.2529.88.camel@phil-desktop> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: zh-CN, en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 01/16] native.bbclass: allow a native package to be populated into its own dir X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:25 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 21:18 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: >> +PACKAGE_OWN_DIR =3D "" >> +bindir .=3D "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" >> +libdir .=3D "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" >> +libexecdir .=3D "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" >=20 > I think the general idea of this patch is a good one but I'm not > terribly fond of the name of that variable. If this is meant to be a > path suffix that you can optionally set for native packages then how > about calling it something like NATIVE_PACKAGE_PATH_SUFFIX? Hi Phil, Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Surely NATIVE_PACKAGE_PATH_SUFFIX is a much better naming! :-) I'll change to use it. Thanks, -- Dexuan