From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KIMURA Osamu Subject: rgw: Bug #13207 has not been backported to Hammer? Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:38:49 +0900 Message-ID: <18745577-e50b-eb93-bb7b-12409a67a8de@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mgwym04.jp.fujitsu.com ([211.128.242.43]:49144 "EHLO mgwym04.jp.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752990AbcHZCBV (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:01:21 -0400 Received: from m3050.s.css.fujitsu.com (msm.b.css.fujitsu.com [10.134.21.208]) by yt-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835CDAC0184 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:38:59 +0900 (JST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel Hi, It may be too late for v0.94.8 time frame, but... Is the bug#13207 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13207 backported to Hammer? I just received a issue from an our customer: buckets or objects that are granted for "AuthenticatedUsers" are accessible by anonymous users. Then I found this issue#13207. Regarding the code on latest hammer branch, it seems this fix is not applied. Is it possible to backport this fix into Hammer? I have a more question. The issue#13207 mentions only for read. If a object is granted FULL_CONTROL for Authenticated Users, is it writable? Regards, -- KIMURA Osamu / 木村 修 Engineering Department, Storage Development Division, Data Center Platform Business Unit, FUJITSU LIMITED