From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (luna.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0A55576B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F87286C8A2; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:23:45 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de From: Martin Steigerwald To: Kent Overstreet Cc: AP , linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Error while unlocking encrypted BCacheFS: Required key not available Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:23:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1876779.tdWV9SEqCh@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: References: <2312305.ElGaqSPkdT@lichtvoll.de> <12360099.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Kent Overstreet - 11.01.24, 17:35:10 CET: > I just made a couple suggestions. I'm sorry if they weren't exactly what > you were looking for? > > If you or someone else wants to help out by writing some code, I just > laid out what needs to happen next - but I'm not your free helpdesk > here, and you're expecting an imediate fix that's not how this works :) That is a misunderstanding. I am not expecting an immediate fix or a fix at all. I did not write I do either. So please do not read something into what I wrote that simply is not there. My programming experience in C is more than 20 years old, certainly not kernel related and not even on the Linux platform and I thought there might be something I as an user might try to at least pin-point the cause of this issue a bit more. Apparently there is not and that is okay with me. Nothing of what I do with BCacheFS has immediate urgency at the moment. -- Martin