All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND2] ptrace: make ptrace() fail if the tracee changed its pid unexpectedly
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 09:56:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1879292286.40455.1620827809948.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512133615.GA19594@redhat.com>

----- On May 12, 2021, at 9:36 AM, Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com wrote:

> On 05/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> On 05/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> >
>> > On 05/11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> >
>> > > That said, why this:
>> > >
>> > > > +       rcu_read_lock();
>> > > > +       pid = task_pid_nr_ns(task, task_active_pid_ns(task->parent));
>> > > > +       rcu_read_unlock();
>> > >
>> > > I don't see why the RCU read lock would be needed? task_pid_nr_ns()
>> > > does any required locking itself, afaik.
>> > >
>> > > And even if it wasn't, this all happens with siglock held, can
>> > > anything actually change.
>> >
>> > ... and with tasklist_lock held.
>> >
>> > Hmm. Linus, I am shy to admit I can't answer immediately, I'll recheck
>> > tomorrow after sleep. But it seems you are right.
>>
>> most probably to protect task->parent, not sure, this was 6 month ago...
>> but in this case we can use "current". I'll recheck.
> 
> Of course you are right, rcu_read_lock() is not needed. Plus we can use
> task_pid_vnr() rather than task_pid_nr_ns(). I've sent v2.

Out of curiosity: what makes it OK to use either the current task or its
parent's pid namespace in this specific case ? What happens if they are
in different pid namespaces ?

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 16:56 [PATCH RESEND2] ptrace: make ptrace() fail if the tracee changed its pid unexpectedly Oleg Nesterov
2021-05-11 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-11 17:53   ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-05-11 18:06     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-05-12 13:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-05-12 13:56         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2021-05-12 14:38           ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1879292286.40455.1620827809948.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.