From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755880AbZCaFpn (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:45:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754838AbZCaFpb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:45:31 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.25]:53193 "EHLO bilbo.ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754582AbZCaFpb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:45:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18897.44438.320859.677262@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:43:50 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] pending perf_counter bits In-Reply-To: <20090330170701.856843742@chello.nl> References: <20090330170701.856843742@chello.nl> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > Most of the previous set, except I kept the powerpc set_perf_counter_pending() > bits. > > This set also adds callchain support for x86 (no userspace yet -- am looking > at porting sysprof). Furthermore, it has a first attempt at making > perf_counters and oprofile and nmi_watchdog not stomp on each other. > > New bits only compile tested on x86_64 and ppc64. Seems to run ok on ppc64, except that the kerneltop output seems to show fewer functions than before, for some reason. Paul.