From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Subject: linux-next: tracebacks in workqueue.c/__flush_work() Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:20:23 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <18a30387-6aa5-6123-e67c-57579ecc3f38@roeck-us.net> (raw) Commit "workqueue: Try to catch flush_work() without INIT_WORK()" added a warning if flush_work() is called without worker function. This results in the following tracebacks, typically observed during system shutdown. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101 at kernel/workqueue.c:3018 __flush_work+0x2a4/0x2e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 101 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-next-20190201 #1 fffffc0007dcbd18 0000000000000000 fffffc00003338a0 fffffc00003517d4 fffffc00003517d4 fffffc0000e56c98 fffffc0000e56c98 fffffc0000ebc1d8 fffffc0000ec0bd8 ffffffffa8024010 0000000000000bca 0000000000000000 fffffc00003d3ea4 fffffc0000e56c98 fffffc0000e56c60 fffffc0000ebc1d8 fffffc0000ec0bd8 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 fffffc000782d520 0000000000000000 fffffc000044ef50 fffffc0007c4b540 Trace: [<fffffc00003338a0>] __warn+0x160/0x190 [<fffffc00003517d4>] __flush_work+0x2a4/0x2e0 [<fffffc00003517d4>] __flush_work+0x2a4/0x2e0 [<fffffc00003d3ea4>] lru_add_drain_all+0xe4/0x190 [<fffffc000044ef50>] shrink_dcache_sb+0x70/0xb0 [<fffffc0000478dc4>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x44/0x80 [<fffffc00003a94fc>] on_each_cpu_cond+0x5c/0x90 [<fffffc0000478d80>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x80 [<fffffc000047fe7c>] invalidate_bdev+0x3c/0x70 [<fffffc0000432ca8>] reconfigure_super+0x178/0x2c0 [<fffffc000045ee64>] ksys_umount+0x664/0x680 [<fffffc000045ee9c>] sys_umount+0x1c/0x30 [<fffffc00003115d4>] entSys+0xa4/0xc0 [<fffffc00003115d4>] entSys+0xa4/0xc0 ---[ end trace 613cea34708701f1 ]--- The problem is seen with several (but not all) architectures. Affected architectures/platforms are: alpha arm:versatilepb m68k mips, mips64 (boot from IDE drive or MMC, SMP disabled) parisc (nosmp builds) sparc, sparc64 (nosmp builds) There may be others; several of my tests fail with build failures. If/when it is seen, the problem is persistent. Common denominator seems to be that SMP is disabled. It does appear that for_each_cpu() ignores the mask for nosmp builds, but I don't really understand why. Guenter
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 22:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-02-02 22:20 Guenter Roeck [this message] 2019-02-03 1:21 ` Tetsuo Handa 2019-02-03 23:46 ` Rusty Russell 2019-02-06 6:31 ` Tetsuo Handa 2019-02-06 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck 2019-02-06 14:57 ` Tetsuo Handa 2019-02-06 16:23 ` Guenter Roeck 2019-02-06 16:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=18a30387-6aa5-6123-e67c-57579ecc3f38@roeck-us.net \ --to=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: linux-next: tracebacks in workqueue.c/__flush_work()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.